Teams

LWR Steffens

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 7.0 W Wednesday

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-04-02vs LBK Club HowardWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Beth Hill vs Deanna Rollyson / Cyn Gillespie6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-20vs GT Bray PauleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Hill / Cindy Davis vs Faye Blakely / Lisa Simotes6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Reagan / Patricia Cunningham vs Terry Olsen / Carrie Scalcucci6-3, 7-5
2025-03-19vs LWR VavrekWon 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Beth Hill vs Cindy Vavrek / Karen Patchell6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Bartlett / DeAnne Fischer vs Linda Armiak / Jeanne OConnor7-6, 6-4
2025-03-12vs Stoneybrook YoungLost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Christine Handel vs Julie Deluca / Andrea Anderson0-4
L#3 DoublesJamie Reagan / Patricia Cunningham vs Debbie French / Cynthia Mattingly3-6, 3-6
2025-02-26vs LWN ArringtonWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaudia Kelly / Noelle Hage vs Rita Battaglia / Carol Williams-Cameron6-4, 6-4
2025-02-19vs University Park GiaimoWon 20
W#2 DoublesClaudia Kelly / Noelle Hage vs Pamela Mathews / Claudia Clark6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDebbie Bieringer / Patricia Cunningham vs Mary Barry / Dodie Shuert6-0, 6-0
2025-02-12vs Courtside KennedyWon 20
W#1 DoublesNoelle Hage / Claudia Kelly vs Belinda Alexander / Deborah Cavness7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoel Davenport / Jamie Reagan vs Karen Scott / Judy Breton7-5, 6-2
2025-02-05vs Sarasota/Kersten/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Reagan / Nancy Bartlett vs Sheryl Eckert / Judy Kersten3-6, 2-6
2025-01-29vs IslandWalk QuandtSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Noelle Hage vs Jane Hurman / Laura Walczak6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristine Scott / DeAnne Fischer vs Laura Quandt / Marianne Vautier6-3, 6-3
2025-01-27vs Royal PayneLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristine Scott / DeAnne Fischer vs Jo Anne Cullen / Linda Evans4-6, 3-6
2025-01-15vs LBK Public GoodwinWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Beth Hill vs Kelly French / Cynthia Strathmann6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDeAnne Fischer / Nancy Bartlett vs Paula Sclichter / Mary Ellen Shapiro4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJamie Reagan / Patricia Cunningham vs Irene Langlois / Gordon Debbie6-4, 6-3
2025-01-08vs LBK Public AssalyWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Hill / Kristine Scott vs Cassandra McPike / Catherine Tomass6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebbie Bieringer / Nancy Bartlett vs Joanne Assaly / Kristy Owens6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesClaudia Kelly / Mary Beth Steffens vs Karen Beaumont / Laura McLean7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Christine Handel
published 4
3.48
Noelle Hage
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Beth Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Kristine Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Nancy Bartlett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
DeAnne Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Jamie Reagan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Claudia Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Debbie Bieringer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Cindy Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Loel Davenport
published
Mary Beth Steffens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Cunningham + Jamie Reagan252451% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Davis + Beth Hill4157% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Cunningham + Nancy Bartlett2346% gamesnot enough data
Beth Hill + Kristine Scott314 matchesnot enough data
DeAnne Fischer + Noelle Hage224 matchesnot enough data
Noelle Hage + Nancy Bartlett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Handel
26W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Noelle Hage
53W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Beth Hill
30W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kristine Scott
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Nancy Bartlett
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
DeAnne Fischer
211W–172L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jamie Reagan
113W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Claudia Kelly
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Debbie Bieringer
27W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cindy Davis
93W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.00
Loel Davenport
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Beth Steffens
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Cunningham
112W–93L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.