Teams

Team 21 Carvajal

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-20vs Team 15 Strings AttachedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElisa Wolf / Ayanna Wiggins vs Anne Ward / Samantha Chapman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanice Zima / Catie Cummings vs Deborah Williams / Susan Campbell7-5, 6-0
2024-04-14vs Team 14 SupernovasLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatie Cummings / Robin Dunning vs Jerien Okoh-Tisch / Karen Sullivan1-6, 3-6
2024-04-07vs Team 16 Springfield Smart AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesElisa Wolf / Monica Popp vs Vanita Deames / Anar Pathak6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaleh Sadeghi / Janice Zima vs Christie Palmer / Jodi Constantino7-5, 4-3
2024-03-20vs Team 17 ServivorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesElisa Wolf / Laura Jairam vs Kristin Clegg / Andrea Hoffman2-6, 6-5
L#2 DoublesJanice Zima / Robin Dunning vs Debra Elliott / Lisa Billington6-7, 2-4
2024-02-26vs Team 18 JonesLost 02
L#1 DoublesElisa Wolf / Catie Cummings vs Sibyll Jones / Stacy Huisman2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Zima / Laura Jairam vs Angela Boone / Carly Mul1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Laura Jairam
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Elisa Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Monica Popp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
3.13
Ayanna Wiggins
published 3.5
2.94
Catie Cummings
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Robin Dunning
published
2.85
Janice Zima
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Alicia O'Brien
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Popp + Elisa Wolf6165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Jairam
184W–85L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Elisa Wolf
177W–86L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Monica Popp
75W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amber Surmiller
21W–37L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Ayanna Wiggins
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Catie Cummings
59W–105L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Robin Dunning
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Janice Zima
231W–194L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Alicia O'Brien
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.