Teams

Ball Busters

2025 COMBO · 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-13vs Thai TopazWon 21
L#1 DoublesReagan Rothe / Nirmal Goswami vs Clint Huang / Robert Martin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTariq Hussain / Brad Millwater vs Paul Thepuatrakul / Carlos Jaramillo7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrad Dawson / Anthony Sorola vs Michael Weinberg / Lynn Harlow2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-13vs The Legendary BanditsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Derrick Layton / Hector Vessi vs Eric Bond / Lee Seidlits0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWesley Hatley / Peter Hollman vs Ignacio Rivera / David Perales0-2
L#3 DoublesReagan Rothe / Nirmal Goswami vs Saurabh Gupta / Matthew Sandidge4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Douglas McKee
published 4
David Derrick Layton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Reagan Rothe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Brad Millwater
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.63
Brad Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Anthony Sorola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Harry Millwater
published 3.5
3.21
Peter Hollman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Hector Vessi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jason Walters
published
Nirmal Goswami
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Wesley Hatley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reagan Rothe + Douglas McKee303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Douglas McKee
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
David Derrick Layton
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Reagan Rothe
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Brad Millwater
22W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.73
4
Brad Dawson
15W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Anthony Sorola
28W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Harry Millwater
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Peter Hollman
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Hector Vessi
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Jason Walters
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nirmal Goswami
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wesley Hatley
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.