Teams

Robbie Wagner, Snow

2023 18&Over Men · 5.0

10 players · average NTRP 5.00 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-24vs LI: Long Beach, BorakLost 03
L#1 DoublesFabian Carchi / James Malhame vs Niles Ghaffar / Carl Barthold4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRon Nano vs Daniel Burgess6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Snow / Parsa Samii vs Adam Borak / Nasser Ghaffar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-20vs LI: Long Beach, BorakLost 12
L#1 DoublesFabian Carchi / Daryl Weber vs Daniel Burgess / Niles Ghaffar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Bohnen vs Dillon McKenzie2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Snow / Parsa Samii vs Adam Borak / Nasser Ghaffar3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-10vs LI: Long Beach, BorakWon 21
W#1 DoublesFabian Carchi / Asika Isoh vs Khurram Nazir / Daniel Burgess6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichael Bohnen vs Scot Hirschfield6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Snow / Jason Cohen vs Adam Borak / Niles Ghaffar3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-29vs LI: Long Beach, BorakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Malhame / Ron Nano vs Adam Borak / Nasser Ghaffar7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFabian Carchi / Daryl Weber vs Carl Barthold / Samuel Bride6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-19vs LI: Long Beach, BorakWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Malhame / Andrew Wiese vs Dillon McKenzie / Carl Barthold6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAsika Isoh vs Daniel Burgess3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Snow / Michael Bohnen vs Niles Ghaffar / Kyle Gower1-6, 6-7
2023-06-15vs LI: Long Beach, BorakLost 01
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Snow vs Daniel Burgess4-6, 4-6
2023-05-22vs LI: Long Beach, BorakSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRon Nano / Andrew Wiese vs Adam Borak / Amani Siddiqui6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFabian Carchi / Michael Bohnen vs Kyle Gower / Khurram Nazir3-6, 3-6
2023-05-11vs LI: Long Beach, BorakWon 20
W#1 DoublesFabian Carchi / Robert Principe vs Adam Borak / Samuel Bride6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRon Nano / Andrew Wiese vs Khurram Nazir / Benjamin Grushkovskiy6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LI: Long Beach, Borak08131128221
2Robbie Wagner, Snow08111330215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.44 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Wiese
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Daryl Weber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Fabian Carchi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.44
Jeffrey Snow
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Asika Isoh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Michael Bohnen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Parsa Samii
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Principe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ron Nano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Todd Ehren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fabian Carchi + Jeffrey Snow2746% games−6.8% vs expected
Fabian Carchi + Daryl Weber2346% gamesnot enough data
Todd Ehren + Jeffrey Snow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Wiese
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Daryl Weber
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Fabian Carchi
10W–16L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Snow
44W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.44
Asika Isoh
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Bohnen
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Parsa Samii
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Principe
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Ron Nano
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Ehren
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.