Teams

MILL VALLEY 40AW3.0A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Aimee McCarthy
published 3.5
3.24
Libby Mitchell
published
3.17
Whitney Lynch
published
3.15
Gisella MacKay
published
3.15
Mallary Walker
published
3.03
Eliot Donahue
published
2.88
Tuyen Bonneau
published
2.83
Marion McKee
published
2.82
Sarah Blanchard
published
Alex Hess
published 3
2.62
Anna Hindley
published 3
2.60
Ingrid Tolson
published
2.60
Sabrina Dumas
published
2.47
Kim McFerrin
published
2.36
Suzanne Westphal
published
Heather Keane
published
Kimberly Knopf
published
Molly Getty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Hindley + Tuyen Bonneau123 matchesnot enough data
Mallary Walker + Aimee McCarthy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aimee McCarthy
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Libby Mitchell
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Whitney Lynch
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Gisella MacKay
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.15
Mallary Walker
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Eliot Donahue
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Tuyen Bonneau
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Marion McKee
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.83
Sarah Blanchard
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Alex Hess
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Anna Hindley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Ingrid Tolson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Sabrina Dumas
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Kim McFerrin
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
Suzanne Westphal
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.36
Heather Keane
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Knopf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Getty
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.