Teams

SFV Dream Weavers

SFV-Mixed 18 & Over · SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJacobus Admiraal / Monica Kaplan vs Melvin Navarro / Teri Gustafson4-6, 5-7
2021-08-08vs SFV Pure DriveWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Ordway / MISSY LOPEZ vs Marcos Sevilla / Jacque Clendennen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-07-24vs SFV Mixed UpWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacobus Admiraal / Terri Admiraal vs Mark Gasper / Kathleen Johnson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKenny Puvogel / MISSY LOPEZ vs Aldo Angrisani / Holly Metts3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-16vs SFV Paseo Crazy AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Ordway / Terri Admiraal vs Jon Peterson / Monique Reyes6-1, 6-1
2021-07-10vs SFV Mixed NutsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Ordway / Terri Admiraal vs Andrea Fruits / Sunny Trinh2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJeremy Bonnell / Monica Kaplan vs Bob Kaufman / Lynne F Krueger3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
James Ordway
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.54
Terri Admiraal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Ronnie Higgs
published
3.44
Jacobus Admiraal
published 3.5
3.29
MISSY LOPEZ
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Rafael Puno
published
3.13
Monica Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Natie MacDonald
published
3.10
Leslie Giammanco
published 3.5
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
RIO NINO GOMEZ
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Ordway
86W–120L career · 7 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Terri Admiraal
122W–87L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.54
Ronnie Higgs
17W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Jacobus Admiraal
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
MISSY LOPEZ
80W–67L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Rafael Puno
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Monica Kaplan
43W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Natie MacDonald
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Leslie Giammanco
88W–83L career · no lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
2.50
RIO NINO GOMEZ
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.