Teams

OC Fullerton TC- Masako 10am

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#2 DoublesKaren Tonelli / Sheri Kumsakul vs Lisa Wellman / Sommer Walker1-6, 5-7
2023-11-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesSheri Kumsakul / Cate Riggs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-20vs OC CMTC - Naomi 10amLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Tonelli / Sheri Kumsakul vs Miki Sugiura / Yukiko Kameda2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Nicole Festini
published
3.57
Patricia Santiago
published
3.36
Nancy Bergman
published
Christina Nihira
published 3.5
3.12
Noemi Rodriguez
published
3.05
Sheri Kumsakul
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Gina Moore
published 3
2.89
Robin Briggs
published
2.80
Karen Tonelli
published
2.73
Evi Dewhurst
published 3
2.60
Wanda Shimazu
published
2.50
Karin Altonaga
published
Larissa Tan
published
Masako Sato
published
Zulema Banados
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wanda Shimazu + Robin Briggs1434% games−10.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Festini
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
Patricia Santiago
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Nancy Bergman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Christina Nihira
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Noemi Rodriguez
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Sheri Kumsakul
38W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Gina Moore
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Robin Briggs
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
Karen Tonelli
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christine Ontiveros
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Evi Dewhurst
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Wanda Shimazu
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Karin Altonaga
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
Larissa Tan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Masako Sato
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Zulema Banados
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.