Teams

The Notorious Ninjas

2024 18&Over Women Winter · 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-28vs Net AssetsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLanae Herman / Frances Pinto vs Lucia Marchetta / Lori Billyard6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDonna Pflug vs Terri Hill4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVictoria Reznik / Laureena McCormack vs Norma Stojanovski / Jennifer Escava6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrenda Rollings / Kristen Striano vs Hope Olenyik / Kimberley Herman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-21vs Stop The LobLost 04
L#1 DoublesFrances Pinto / Cathy Kruse vs Suzanne Crosby / Olga McIntyre4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTina Wong vs Michelle Prager5-7, 3-5
L#2 DoublesBrenda Rollings / Amy Chrebet vs Mary Walsh / Nicole Egan2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Walsh / Patty Humes vs Nancy Lasher / Lisa Huch6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2024-03-14vs Dream TeamSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLori Bennett / Carolyn Stanyek vs Tara Gorny / Meredith Rocco7-5, 6-5
W#1 SinglesDonna Pflug vs Michele Bednarsh6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatty Humes / Jennifer Walsh vs Tami Sasala / Karen Donahue2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeiko Gendi / Mandy Carri vs Kristi Linz / Frieda Cohen2-6, 3-6
2024-03-07vs Net AssetsWon 40
W#1 DoublesLori Bennett / Carolyn Stanyek vs Kerry Sepe / Susie Greenfeig6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTina Wong vs Terri Hill6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Striano / Dima Mousselli vs Hope Olenyik / Michele Gioia6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJaime Shapiro / Jennifer Walsh vs Lucia Marchetta / Lulu Ablan6-3, 7-5
2024-02-29vs Stop The LobLost 13
W#1 DoublesKristen Striano / Sarah Chin vs Mary Walsh / Nicole Egan6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMandy Carri vs Olga McIntyre6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Kruse / Victoria Reznik vs Tracy Nitche / Jacylene Holloway3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTina Wong / Laureena McCormack vs Jennifer Sharpe / Nancy Lasher3-6, 2-6
2024-02-22vs Dream TeamLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristen Striano / Victoria Reznik vs Liz Toolan / Brittanny Schwarz1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Chin vs Meredith Rocco6-4, 5-3
L#2 DoublesCathy Kruse / Lanae Herman vs Karen Donahue / Tami Sasala3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Eby / Jennifer Walsh vs Kelly Boyle / Frieda Cohen3-6, 4-6
2024-02-08vs Stop The LobLost 13
L#1 DoublesPatty Humes / Jaime Shapiro vs Mary Walsh / Nicole Egan4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTina Wong vs Olga McIntyre6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Bennett / Kristen Striano vs Amy Pham / Tracy Nitche6-3, 6-5
L#3 DoublesKeiko Gendi / Jennifer Walsh vs Jennifer Sharpe / Jill Vicario7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-02-01vs Dream TeamLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Stanyek / Lori Bennett vs Erina Watts / Tara Gorny4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMandy Carri vs Alyssa Tesei4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDima Mousselli / Laureena McCormack vs Amy Greenberg / Karen Donahue4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCathy Kruse / Jennifer Walsh vs Cindy Starke / Michele Bednarsh6-4, 6-1
2024-01-25vs Net AssetsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDima Mousselli / Carolyn Stanyek vs Michele Gioia / Marie Collazo6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Chin vs Elizabeth Miller6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Striano / Catherine Eby vs Jackie Barber / Susie Greenfeig3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJaime Shapiro / Michelle Donner vs Kathleen Wallace / Lori Billyard3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Sarah Chin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Carolyn Stanyek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Lori Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Laureena McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Tina Wong
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Victoria Reznik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amy Chrebet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cathy Kruse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Brenda Rollings
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Donna Pflug
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Catherine Eby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Keiko Gendi
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.16
Kristen Striano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Mandy Carri
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Dima Mousselli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Patty Humes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Jaime Shapiro
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Michelle Donner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Frances Pinto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lanae Herman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Reznik + Laureena McCormack6366% games+16.4% vs expected
Kristen Striano + Sarah Chin3261% games+6.9% vs expected
Brenda Rollings + Keiko Gendi474251% games+3.2% vs expected
Carolyn Stanyek + Lori Bennett151054% games+2.9% vs expected
Patty Humes + Jaime Shapiro6947% games+0.4% vs expected
Dima Mousselli + Carolyn Stanyek121648% games+0.3% vs expected
Carolyn Stanyek + Kristen Striano161651% games−1.3% vs expected
Victoria Reznik + Kristen Striano383748% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Chin
68W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.98
3.5
Carolyn Stanyek
111W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Lori Bennett
90W–135L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Laureena McCormack
59W–47L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Tina Wong
93W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Victoria Reznik
110W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Amy Chrebet
16W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Kruse
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Rollings
71W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Donna Pflug
48W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Catherine Eby
38W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Keiko Gendi
69W–56L career · 7 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Kristen Striano
118W–126L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Mandy Carri
49W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Dima Mousselli
54W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Patty Humes
59W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Jaime Shapiro
73W–89L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Michelle Donner
61W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Frances Pinto
32W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lanae Herman
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.