Teams

RCCB - Tattersall

2025 Brevard Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-14vs EGYC - LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesRuthan Tattersall / Pete Tattersall vs Mary Stallard / Thomas Stallard4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Lasko / Thomas Lasko vs Patricia Blochtein / Alex Blochtein1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGregg Galzerano / Christy Galzerano vs Sallie Benke / Gregory Benke0-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs EGYC - LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dunn / Robert Dunn vs Mary Stallard / Thomas Stallard5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Tarquinio / Rick Tarquinio vs Leslie Love / Craig Tretheway0-6, 1-6
2025-01-31vs Brevard/Reza/40&Over6.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRuthan Tattersall / Pete Tattersall vs Adrian Reza / Anastasia Mika5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Lasko / Thomas Lasko vs Maria Reza / Leonardo Miotti2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Galzerano / Gregg Galzerano vs Jill Lyons / Santiago Jimenez2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Robert Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Brenda Tarquinio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Ruthan Tattersall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Pete Tattersall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Michelle Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Stephanie Lasko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Larry Hingle
published
2.56
Katherine Hingle
published
2.55
Thomas Lasko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Christy Galzerano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gregg Galzerano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Rick Tarquinio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruthan Tattersall + Pete Tattersall2352% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Lasko + Thomas Lasko2349% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Dunn + Robert Dunn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Dunn
17W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Ruthan Tattersall
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Pete Tattersall
16W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Michelle Dunn
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Stephanie Lasko
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.69
Larry Hingle
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Katherine Hingle
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Thomas Lasko
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Christy Galzerano
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Gregg Galzerano
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rick Tarquinio
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.