Teams

Co.Wilkins18M

2024 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-06vs Ne.Day18MWon 10
W#2 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / Aneesh Kodali vs Peter Vangraafeiland / Emily Perry3-4
2024-08-06vs Ne.Day18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Tanita Tedamrongwanish vs Andrew Stewart / MacY Fisher2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-21vs Ne.Day18MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hiller / Grant McGrew vs Caylan Ashworth / Gary Caiola3-6, 6-4
2024-06-23vs Ne.Day18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / MaryBeth Jackson vs Nena Marks / Samson Keefer7-5, 6-3
2024-06-09vs Ne.Day18MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Breunig / Grant McGrew vs Caylan Ashworth / Gary Caiola4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesJamie Breunig / Grant McGrew vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 10.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Jennifer Hiller
published
4.81
Justin Radloff
published
4.81
Grant McGrew
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.80
Elizabeth Hodges
published
4.67
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.63
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.60
Jamie Breunig
published
4.51
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Parker Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.39
Nick Brittis
published
4.37
Angelina Neiberger
published 4.5
4.31
Aneesh Kodali
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanita Tedamrongwanish + Aneesh Kodali9853% games+7.2% vs expected
MaryBeth Jackson + Aneesh Kodali314 matchesnot enough data
MaryBeth Jackson + Parker Sheridan224 matchesnot enough data
Grant McGrew + Jennifer Hiller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hiller
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.93
Justin Radloff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Grant McGrew
92W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.81
Elizabeth Hodges
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
178W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Connor Wilkins
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.63
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
107W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Parker Sheridan
202W–65L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
Nick Brittis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Angelina Neiberger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–58L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.