Teams

Pinellas/Pasinski/Mixed18&Over8.0

2023 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 8.0 MXD Sunday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-15vs Tarpon 8.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesMonty Johnson / Allison Guerra vs Andreas Waldthausen / Joanne O Ryan5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Hunter / Laurie Smith vs Jose Jarabo / Melissa Sheridan7-5, 6-2
2023-06-11vs ELW ChristisonWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarry Niemann / Laurie Smith vs James Bettencourt / Kirsten Willis6-4, 6-2
2023-05-21vs SPTC Holliday 8.0 XWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Monty Johnson vs Jack Willett / Jamyne Smith6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNatalia Illich / Jeffrey Biezunski vs Samantha Romasiewicz / Antonio Williams6-2, 7-6
2023-05-07vs McMullen FramersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMonty Johnson / Laurie Smith vs Lance Hill / Robyn Wittleder6-2, 6-1
2023-04-30vs Seminole Lake TimminsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Biezunski / Natalia Illich vs George Pierce / Gina Timmins6-1, 6-1
2023-04-23vs ELW OrrWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarry Niemann / Laurie Smith vs Scott McGovern / Morgan Domson7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-16vs ELW ChristisonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonty Johnson / Natalia Illich vs Felix Herrera / Wendy Unger7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Ray Pasinski
published
3.90
Brian Hodapp
published 4
3.89
Bonnie Bauer
published 4
3.86
Amy Brooks
published 4
3.83
Monty Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Allison Guerra
published 4
3.68
Natalia Illich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
William Hunter
published
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monty Johnson + Laurie Smith351558% games+5.9% vs expected
William Hunter + Amy Brooks6156% games+0.8% vs expected
Monty Johnson + Natalia Illich134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Pasinski
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
4
Brian Hodapp
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Bonnie Bauer
32W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Amy Brooks
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Monty Johnson
134W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Allison Guerra
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Natalia Illich
80W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.68
William Hunter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 5 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.