Teams

Ritz Carlton - Gustafson

2021 Collier Combo 18 & Over Spring · 8.5 Women Spring

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesAlison Zea / Dayna Webre vs Lynne Hancock / Vesna Petrovic3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Garber / Kristie McCormick vs Kristy Cardina / Sindi Sanzica0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesLynn Johns / Karolina Klarowicz vs Amanda Myers / Sindi Sanzica6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDayna Webre / Alison Zea vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Valerie Khammash1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKarolina Klarowicz / Lynn Johns vs Valerie Khammash / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Puddester / Sara Wachs vs Amber Hill / Kristy Cardina6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesAmber Bogdanowicz / Lynn Johns vs Nannette Staropoli / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSheila MacNicol / Amista Morgan vs Amanda Myers / Heather Christie7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSara Wachs / Kari Gustafson vs Valerie Khammash / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDayna Webre / Lynn Johns vs Vesna Petrovic / Lynne Hancock3-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesKari Gustafson / Sara Wachs vs Terry Dirr / Nannette Staropoli4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDayna Webre / Wendy Garber vs Valerie Khammash / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Lynn Johns
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Sara Wachs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Kristie McCormick
published
4.04
4.03
Dayna Webre
usually #2 Doubles 85%, also #1 Doubles 15% · published 4.5
3.92
Amy Gardner
published 4
3.92
Laurie Puddester
published
3.88
Wendy Garber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Karolina Klarowicz
published
3.35
Amista Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kari Gustafson
published
Sheila MacNicol
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Wachs + Lynn Johns19956% games−2.9% vs expected
Wendy Garber + Dayna Webre9361% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
Sara Wachs
147W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
4.16
Kristie McCormick
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Amber Bogdanowicz
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
4.04
4.5
Dayna Webre
148W–80L career · 13 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Amy Gardner
14W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
Laurie Puddester
21W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
Wendy Garber
128W–93L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.88
Karolina Klarowicz
12W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Amista Morgan
18W–36L career · 1 line in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.35
Kari Gustafson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sheila MacNicol
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.