Teams

Henkin - Serve & Folly Singles

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-09-20vs Zhao - The AvengersLost 02
L#1 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Tana Jankowiak0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Sueyun Hsieh3-6, 2-6
2025-09-04vs Shaffer - Alley CatsLost 02
L#1 SinglesCaroline Storer vs Miyuki Sato3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Carina Villagra6-7, 4-4
2025-08-23vs Du - Honey Deuce 3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesSandra Murcia vs ZIJING YE6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJennie Kim vs Wenxi Li0-6, 2-6
2025-08-19vs Zhao - The AvengersWon 20
W#1 SinglesCaroline Storer vs Sueyun Hsieh6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Wenbo Li6-3, 6-1
2025-08-12vs YangWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennie Kim vs Yurong Zhang0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCaroline Storer vs Lynda Nguyen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesClaudia Guardia vs Hazel Yang6-1, 6-1
2025-08-07vs Robertson - Rose All PlayLost 01
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Krudys vs Jennifer Yang4-6, 3-6
2025-08-02vs Shaffer - Alley CatsWon 10
W#1 SinglesClaudia Guardia vs Laura Jairam6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-25vs Du - Honey Deuce 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesJennie Kim vs ZIJING YE2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesSandra Murcia vs Barbara Braffett6-2, 6-3
2025-07-12vs YangWon 21
L#1 SinglesClaudia Guardia vs Yucong Gao2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Hazel Yang6-0, 6-7
W#3 SinglesSandra Murcia vs Tawanrut Cheevaphantusri6-2, 6-2
2025-07-10vs Robertson - Rose All PlayLost 02
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Krudys vs Sherra Dung2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesClaudia Guardia vs Anto Faini3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Sandra Murcia
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Penelope Bell
published
3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Suzanne Krudys
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Claudia Guardia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Tamar Henkin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Caroline Storer
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
3.02
Anne Sherman
published 3.5
2.90
Robin Rudowitz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Tanna Nelson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandra Murcia
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Penelope Bell
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Jennie Kim
265W–126L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Claudia Guardia
65W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Tamar Henkin
116W–147L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Caroline Storer
39W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Anne Sherman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Robin Rudowitz
25W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Tanna Nelson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.