Teams

ALL AMERICAN TENNIS CLUB

2021 TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.31 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-09-17vs DTC #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Dragnev / Riley Stahley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJonathan Boarini / Jim Ray vs Nick Snow / Brent Muir1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAllen Tang / Kyle Clingo vs Niclas Paalzow / Nick Nardiello6-7, 5-7
2021-09-10vs TPCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJusto Martinez / Vitaly Pecharsky vs Andrew Manson / Jean-Francois Blais7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Mori / Riley Stahley vs Aaron Harris / Duane Bickmore7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErick Sanchez / John Coursey vs Ryan Vannah / Parminder Kang4-6, 6-7
2021-08-27vs RED ROCK CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesCody Kennedy / Vitaly Pecharsky vs Chris Hubbard / Sean Margulis2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRiley Stahley / Justo Martinez vs Edward Song / Kirk Howser6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJonathan Boarini / Jim Ray vs Christopher Rathbun / Xin Wang7-5, 7-5
2021-08-20vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 12
L#1 DoublesKyle Clingo / Cody Kennedy vs Richard Jade / Brennan Price1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Dragnev / James Mori vs Kenneth Le / Milo Berger3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErick Sanchez / Jonathan Boarini vs Rod Faircloth / Carlos Espinoza6-2, 6-4
2021-08-19vs SPANISH OAKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesVitaly Pecharsky / Cody Kennedy vs Terrance Nichols / Aaron Shumway3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Mori / Riley Stahley vs Pankaj Bisht / Sandeep Potturi6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJim Ray / John Coursey vs Ilko Nachev / Stephen DeGuzman2-6, 2-6
2021-08-06vs DTC #3Lost 12
L#1 DoublesVitaly Pecharsky / Allen Tang vs Derek Hillman / Kevin Howard3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRiley Stahley / James Mori vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesErick Sanchez / John Coursey vs Michael Monroe / Robert Pacella2-6, 1-6
2021-07-30vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCody Kennedy / Kyle Clingo vs Jake Cuttler / Attila Tokay3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRiley Stahley / Daniel Dragnev vs Daigo Ishikawa / Joseph DeMilliano6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJonathan Boarini / Erick Sanchez vs Aaron Schnitz / Jason Tang4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-07-23vs DTC #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Dragnev / Riley Stahley vs Tyler Burt / Michael Borenstein4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVitaly Pecharsky / Kyle Clingo vs Joaquin Castruita / Nick Nardiello5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJim Ray / John Coursey vs Lee Robinson / Brent Muir4-6, 1-6
2021-07-16vs TPCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCody Kennedy / Vitaly Pecharsky vs Jean-Francois Blais / Andrew Manson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Dragnev / Justo Martinez vs David Altfas / Aaron Harris6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJonathan Boarini / Erick Sanchez vs Parminder Kang / Ryan Vannah7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC #345121532249
2TPC36111635269
3ALL AMERICAN TENNIS CLUB27101736269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Kochkorn Bailin
published 4.5
4.04
Kyle Clingo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.02
Vitaly Pecharsky
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.00
Riley Stahley
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.93
James Mori
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Daniel Dragnev
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Cody Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Jim Ray
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Erick Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
John Coursey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Justo Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Mori + Riley Stahley331755% games+5.6% vs expected
Kyle Clingo + Cody Kennedy112047% games−3.0% vs expected
Jim Ray + John Coursey2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kochkorn Bailin
134W–100L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Kyle Clingo
64W–105L career · 4 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Vitaly Pecharsky
107W–115L career · 6 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
4.02
4.5
Riley Stahley
122W–87L career · 7 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
4.00
4.5
James Mori
105W–89L career · 4 lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Daniel Dragnev
227W–142L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Cody Kennedy
73W–114L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Jim Ray
102W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Erick Sanchez
106W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
3.37
John Coursey
28W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Justo Martinez
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.