Teams

CTL18/PETERSON/CTC

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.95 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-29vs CTL18/GUPTA/WCFWon 20
W#1 DoublesShannon Peterson / Alex Taber vs Michelle Mueckler / Javier Uriarte6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDawson Thornton / Sandy Shannon vs Divesh Gupta / Melissa Pickrel6-3, 6-4
2024-05-15vs CTL18/GUPTA/WCFWon 20
W#1 DoublesShannon Peterson / Allen White vs Divesh Gupta / Madison Pickrel6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarrett Self / Katherine Cromer vs David Zalesne / Anny Zalesne6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hal Fant
published 4.5
3.96
Ginger Lee
published 4.5
3.88
Janaki Emani
published
3.85
Dawson Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Mollie Kocher
published
3.77
Drew James
published 4
3.70
Shannon Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Bryan Raines
published 4
3.56
Austin Kocher
published 4
3.56
Barrett Self
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Joanna Dover
published
3.50
Christy Davis
published 4
3.44
Alex Taber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Neal Olsgaard
published
3.33
William Draffin
published
Amelia Murphy
published 3.5
Ashley Kirkham
published 3.5
3.16
Juanita Cooney
published
Jessica Hallman
published
Justin Leonardelli
published
Mary Raines
published
William Echols
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hal Fant
22W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Ginger Lee
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
Janaki Emani
56W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Dawson Thornton
102W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Mollie Kocher
48W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Drew James
36W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Shannon Peterson
146W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Bryan Raines
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Austin Kocher
56W–36L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Barrett Self
47W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Joanna Dover
34W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
4
Christy Davis
45W–18L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Alex Taber
71W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Neal Olsgaard
48W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
William Draffin
33W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Amelia Murphy
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ashley Kirkham
47W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Juanita Cooney
91W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.16
Jessica Hallman
44W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Justin Leonardelli
38W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Raines
27W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Echols
20W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.