Teams

WS - Torres

2022 Marion Trilevel 18 & Over · 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-02vs MARION/FK - LairdSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEnrique Vargas / Josh Spink vs Tyler Jones / Peter Grosshans6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJorge Torres-Vazquez / Derek Farnsworth vs Gary Greer / Kevin Laird4-6, 1-6
2022-10-02vs FK - RyalsWon 20
W#1 DoublesThomas Duffaut / Enrique Vargas vs Dillon Lagano / John Mcmichael6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDan Harloff / David Cianci vs Edwin Santiago / Matthew Sarisky6-1, 6-1
2022-10-01vs MARION/FK - LairdWon 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Duffaut / Josh Spink vs Peter Grosshans / Adalberto Lozano4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJorge Torres-Vazquez / Isaac Barron vs Kevin Laird / Tyler Jones3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDan Harloff / David Cianci vs Guy REYHERME / Ron Quinn6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-01vs FK - RyalsLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Duffaut / Enrique Vargas vs John Mcmichael / Dillon Lagano6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJorge Torres-Vazquez / Isaac Barron vs George Ryals / Rubin Crespo5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDan Harloff / Gonzalo Suarez vs Matthew Sarisky / Christopher Camp7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Isaac Barron
published 4
3.73
Josh Spink
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Thomas Duffaut
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Enrique Vargas
published 3.5
3.31
Dan Harloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
David Cianci
published 3
3.05
Derek Farnsworth
published 3
2.82
Jorge Torres-Vazquez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Timothy Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Spink + Thomas Duffaut4743% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Duffaut + Jorge Torres-Vazquez5261% gamesnot enough data
Josh Spink + Jorge Torres-Vazquez4162% gamesnot enough data
Jorge Torres-Vazquez + Dan Harloff224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Isaac Barron
20W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Josh Spink
186W–129L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Thomas Duffaut
194W–155L career · 3 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Enrique Vargas
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Dan Harloff
100W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3
David Cianci
24W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%3%97%
3.25
3
Derek Farnsworth
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Jorge Torres-Vazquez
162W–139L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Timothy Ferguson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.