Teams

J.Byrd/B.Eckles

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesJermaine Byrd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-24vs J.Monaghen 4.5 18Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Beomjun Ju vs Mickey Plowden / Jeremy Saunders6-1, 7-5
2023-05-22vs M.LaddLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeomjun Ju / Jermaine Byrd vs Davis Felts / Bruce Mildwurf1-6, 2-6
2023-04-23vs B.KOREN 18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesIan Young / Jermaine Byrd vs Christopher Edwards / Jason Kinder2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTyler Newman / Brett Eckles vs Brian Maher / Nicolas Rose2-6, 2-6
2023-04-16vs M.TreiresLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Connor Wilkins4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Joe Twer vs Richard McClenny / Jason Abhau4-6, 2-6
2023-04-11vs S.WingoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Peter Hull vs Corey Cooper / Sean Heuser6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Alex Renfrow vs Nile Testerman / Takayuki Yamato6-2, 6-2
2023-03-20vs P.KellySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Robby Taylor vs Peter Blankenship / Mike Trefzger6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Tyler Newman vs Peter Kelly / Matthew Presser4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-19vs C.VinsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Peter Hull vs Carlos Garcia-Shelton / Allan Badulis3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Hilpert / Brett Eckles vs Rubens Vianna / Connor Funk6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Alex Renfrow
published 4.5
4.15
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.07
Robby Taylor
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.00
Eric Hilpert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Andrew Perdue5254% games+4.2% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Alex Renfrow
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
Robby Taylor
15W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
4.07
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 9 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
Eric Hilpert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.