Teams

Kulas - Platinum Aces

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-14vs Broome-CowenLost 02
L#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Sandra Bowers vs Andrea Keller / Diane Osborne Yates2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSandra Savino / Caroline Willcox vs Liane Long / Tammy Willett3-6, 6-7
2025-08-07vs Broome-CowenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Norma Young vs Mary Broome / Liane Long1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Savino / Caroline Willcox vs Tammy Willett / Christine Cowen2-6, 3-6
2025-07-31vs Broome-CowenWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Norma Young vs Tammy Willett / Diane Osborne Yates7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-24vs Broome-CowenLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Savino / Susan Nixon vs Tammy Willett / Diane Osborne Yates1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNorma Young / Cynthia Futrell vs Janet Marx / Marcela Anongos0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBeth Kulas / Sandra Bowers vs Linda Sidone / Kelly Elliott6-1, 6-2
2025-07-17vs Broome-CowenWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Beth Skolnick vs Liane Long / Christine Cowen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Savino / Caroline Willcox vs Mary Broome / Joyce Howell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Perry DiBona vs Mary Broome / Liane Long4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-26vs Broome-CowenWon 20
W#2 DoublesNorma Young / Susan Nixon vs Marcela Anongos / Andrea Keller6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSandra Savino / Perry DiBona vs Linda Sidone / Kelly Elliott6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Beth Skolnick
published 3.5
3.29
Beth Kulas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Janet Brashear
published
3.17
Caroline Willcox
published 3.5
3.15
Norma Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Sandra Savino
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Skolnick + Beth Kulas3353% gamesnot enough data
Beth Kulas + Norma Young3245% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Skolnick
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Janet Brashear
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Caroline Willcox
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Norma Young
81W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sandra Savino
43W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.