Teams

Truglio/55/7.5/Sli/HJC

2025 Slidell Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men · 7.5 Slidell (55&O) Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-09vs Calamari/55/7.5/SLI/HJCLost 12
W#1 DoublesChuck Truglio / Stan Elmore vs Ernest Anderson / Dave Kronlage6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Leblanc / Allan Cougle vs Patrick Hays / Jeffrey Bacino0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Clinkscales / Richard Armond vs Henry P Calamari / Scott White2-6, 2-4
2025-09-30vs Calamari/55/7.5/SLI/HJCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Leblanc / Richard Armond vs Patrick Hays / Scott White4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Brennan / Allan Cougle vs Ernest Anderson / Jack Pecot3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesChuck Truglio / Stan Elmore vs Dave Kronlage / Ronnie Savoy6-4, 6-4
2025-09-23vs Calamari/55/7.5/SLI/HJCLost 12
L#1 DoublesChuck Truglio / Ladson Poole vs Ernest Anderson / Gilbert Robinson6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Clinkscales / Stan Elmore vs James Vining / Scott White6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Leblanc / Allan Cougle vs Henry P Calamari / Jeffrey Bacino6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-16vs Calamari/55/7.5/SLI/HJCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Brennan / Stan Elmore vs Ernest Anderson / Scott White0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Truglio / Ladson Poole vs Patrick Hays / Jack Pecot3-6, 4-6
2025-09-09vs Calamari/55/7.5/SLI/HJCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaul Clinkscales / Stan Elmore vs Patrick Hays / Ronnie Savoy4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChuck Truglio / Ladson Poole vs Henry P Calamari / Jack Pecot6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Slidell (55&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Chuck Truglio
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Daniel Brennan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Paul Clinkscales
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Kevin Leblanc
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Ladson Poole
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Richard Armond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Stan Elmore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Allan Cougle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Clinkscales + Chuck Truglio1439% games−7.6% vs expected
Stan Elmore + Richard Armond2351% games−9.8% vs expected
Stan Elmore + Ladson Poole3449% gamesnot enough data
Paul Clinkscales + Stan Elmore033 matchesnot enough data
Chuck Truglio + Ladson Poole123 matchesnot enough data
Ladson Poole + Richard Armond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chuck Truglio
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Daniel Brennan
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Paul Clinkscales
3W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
Kevin Leblanc
3W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.26
Ladson Poole
33W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Richard Armond
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Stan Elmore
15W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Allan Cougle
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.