Teams

PLEASANTON 40AW4.0A-DT

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0 Daytime

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule21 played
2023-03-19vs BAY CLUB PL 40AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Traci Krueger vs Mi Qi / Haili Zhuang6-2, 6-0
2023-03-17vs BLACKHAWK CC 40AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Jennifer Perkins vs Julie Lassig / Wendy Greer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-12vs RUBY HILL GC 40AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Cummings / Margaret Harrison vs Nora Hart / Kelly Hankins1-6, 0-3
2023-03-08vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Miller / Tracy Leeds vs Chandra Thomas / Angelita Vallejo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-24vs BAY TREES PK 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Kathlyn Powers vs Ping Wang / Linda Lowe2-6, 0-6
2023-02-21vs PLEASANTON 40AW4.0B-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Leeds / Trish O'Connor vs Christine Hohenstein / Kym Dawid7-5, 6-4
2023-02-18vs RUBY HILL GC 40AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Laura Miller vs Christine Harkness / Patricia Kang6-2, 6-1
2023-02-16vs DIABLO CC 40AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Tracy Leeds vs Madeleine Johnson / Veronica Butcher6-1, 6-3
2023-02-11vs FREMONT TC 40AW4.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Tracy Leeds vs Jennifer Dinh / Margie Moran6-3, 6-2
2023-02-11vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Leeds / Sheri Pon vs Natalie Duxbury / Deborah Dyer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesNancy Doan / Tracy Leeds vs Lori Bouch / Teresa Gilliland6-3, 6-3
2023-02-07vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Aneja / Margaret Harrison vs Rosemary Cowen-Knight / Sandra Fox4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-04vs PLEASANTON 40AW4.0CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTraci Krueger / Tracy Leeds vs Caitlin Finnell / Noa Ramo-Larios4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Debbie Baker vs Erika Garell / Jennifer Leebove7-5, 6-3
2023-01-31vs MEADOW STC 40AW4.0A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Susan Aneja vs Laura Revelos / Kat Panos5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Sharon Nasstrom vs Chelsea McClure / Diana Corbin6-4, 7-6
2023-01-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Karen Sonobe vs Donna Colteaux / Michele Peterson6-3, 6-4
2023-01-29vs BERKELEY TC 40AW4.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Doan / Tracy Leeds vs Thelma Lancaster / Judy Gonzalez-Massih6-0, 6-0
2023-01-27vs BAY CLUB PL 40AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Leeds / Traci Krueger vs Julie Dulac / Haili Zhuang6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Sarah Carey vs Becca Laufenberg / Lyn Hunter6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Leeds / Margaret Harrison vs Julie Yi / Susan Aneja6-0, 6-0
2023-01-21vs Bay Club Fremont 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesKathlyn Powers / Lani Aurelius vs Susan Chang / Dellys Nguyen2-6, 2-6
2023-01-07vs FREMONT TC 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Herman / Margaret Harrison vs Cecilia Cardenas / Judy Halper4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Margaret Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
3.93
Tracy Leeds
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
3.64
Julie Yi
published
3.63
Joanna Sienkiewicz
published
3.61
Susan Aneja
published
3.57
Kathleen Olla
published
3.42
Kimba Warford
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.16
Gayle Abal
published 3.5
3.15
Trish O'Connor
published
Sarah Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Yi + Susan Aneja6263% games+10.8% vs expected
Tracy Leeds + Margaret Harrison18760% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Harrison
325W–140L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
Tracy Leeds
96W–40L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.93
Julie Yi
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Joanna Sienkiewicz
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Susan Aneja
35W–30L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kathleen Olla
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.57
Kimba Warford
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 16 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gayle Abal
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Trish O'Connor
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Sarah Carey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.