Teams

Baby Got Backhand

Fire & Ice 2025 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-06vs Sleigh All DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesErika Ganey / Stephanie Heinrich vs Heather Wilkinson / Stacy Gallo4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Palomino / Valeria de la Rocha vs Elaine Taylor / Deeann Sanchez7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Molitor / MELISSA PENA vs Sara Traugott / Melanie Hanssen6-3, 6-1
2025-12-05vs Slay BellesLost 03
L#1 DoublesRhonda Claiborne / Ana Allegretti vs Lauren Johnson / Johanna Suttle3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Heinrich / Victoria Fine vs Chelsea Mills / Laurie Winters2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRosalinda Rodriguez / Candace Chanler vs Stephanie Hankins / Emily Brown1-6, 1-6
2025-12-05vs ComadrAce Fire and IceLost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Allegretti / Rhonda Claiborne vs Amanda Barto / SELINA TREVINO1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmara Yawen Hung / Rong Shambrock vs Pravina Mulchand / Pamela Vinals0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Fine / Sandra Palomino vs Andrea Gallegos / Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Erika Ganey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
MELISSA PENA
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Ana Allegretti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Sandra Palomino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Rhonda Claiborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Rong Shambrock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Amara Yawen Hung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Stephanie Heinrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Christina Molitor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Valeria de la Rocha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Rosalinda Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Candace Chanler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Victoria Fine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rong Shambrock + Amara Yawen Hung71145% games−5.3% vs expected
Rosalinda Rodriguez + Ana Allegretti2344% gamesnot enough data
Rosalinda Rodriguez + Sandra Palomino314 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Palomino + Victoria Fine044 matchesnot enough data
Erika Ganey + Rhonda Claiborne033 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Rodriguez + Candace Chanler123 matchesnot enough data
Ana Allegretti + Rhonda Claiborne033 matchesnot enough data
Candace Chanler + Rong Shambrock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erika Ganey
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
MELISSA PENA
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ana Allegretti
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Sandra Palomino
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Rhonda Claiborne
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Rong Shambrock
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Amara Yawen Hung
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Stephanie Heinrich
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Christina Molitor
4W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Valeria de la Rocha
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Rosalinda Rodriguez
17W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.52
2.5
Candace Chanler
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Victoria Fine
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.