Teams

SDNC 4.0 Brengle Terrace (2:2)/ Quintal

2024 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-24vs SDNC 4.0 LSF (3:1)/ PrendergastLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Rezac / Robert Tysor vs Robert Prendergast / Jon Corn0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTroy Anderson / Mark Rezac vs Steve Kimble / Xing Zeng6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEvan Green / Jeff Scarano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesEvan Green / Bill Lenaway vs Eugene Hotta / Scott Williams7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Alfrey / Jeff Scarano vs Michael Harmon / Jason Vint6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-02-18vs SDNC 4.0 La Costa (3:1)/ FlahertyLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Tysor / Mark Rezac vs Agustin Lebron / Matthew Kessler2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBill Lenaway / Patrick Coughlin vs Mouchuan Lin / Stepan Kartsub6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Rezac / Robert Tysor vs Robert Froyd / Nishant Patel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Lenaway / Evan Green vs Andre Freund / Robert Lozano4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Rezac / Scott Quintal vs Todd Bulich / Dave Gehrke2-6, 4-6
2024-01-14vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC (2:2)/ YeemLost 02
L#2 DoublesEvan Green / Bill Lenaway vs Rand Smith / Michael Donahue3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJason Alfrey / Jeff Scarano vs Martin Yanofsky / Jeffrey Ackley3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJason Alfrey / Bill Lenaway vs Albert Cohen / Leonardo Simpser6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEvan Green / Mark Rezac vs Steven Richman / Mark Martinet6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Bill Lenaway
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Evan Green
published 4
3.71
Scott Quintal
published
3.62
Mark Rezac
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.60
Troy Anderson
published
3.49
Jeff Scarano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Stas Tara
published
Jeff Bernard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Troy Anderson + Bill Lenaway4253% gamesnot enough data
Evan Green + Mark Rezac224 matchesnot enough data
Bill Lenaway + Mark Rezac213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Lenaway
61W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Evan Green
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Scott Quintal
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Mark Rezac
87W–72L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Troy Anderson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jeff Scarano
28W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Stas Tara
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Jeff Bernard
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.