Teams

LA - LATC

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-19vs LA - MCC Court KingsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoseph Byrne / William Orkin vs Gerald Tarlow / Raul Hernandez6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-18vs LA - Griffin Club 4.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesOliver Walsh / Howard Owens vs Jeffrey Kabot / Mark Miscavage6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaul Ruehl / Greg Comanor vs Michael Jay / Javad Kazemieh6-3, 6-4
2025-09-21vs LA - Dragon FireWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Lee / Austen Earl vs Yorland Tellez / KJ Park2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Brown / William Orkin vs Pierre Guo / Stephen Nimick6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Cheng / Ivan Fatovic vs Benjamin Kramer / Greg Abramson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Austen Earl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Oliver Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Adam Cole-kelly
published 4
3.78
Greg Comanor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Albert Chou
published 4
3.76
William Orkin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ivan Fatovic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Howard Owens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Joseph Byrne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Vincent Carolan-Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
David Padua
published 3.5
3.40
Johnny Kostrey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Michael Turrill
published
Paul Ruehl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Orkin + David Padua134 matchesnot enough data
Vincent Carolan-Foster + Johnny Kostrey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austen Earl
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.04
Oliver Walsh
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Adam Cole-kelly
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Greg Comanor
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Albert Chou
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
William Orkin
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Ivan Fatovic
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Howard Owens
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Joseph Byrne
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
Vincent Carolan-Foster
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
David Padua
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Johnny Kostrey
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Michael Turrill
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Paul Ruehl
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.