Teams

ACAC Jackson / Preusser Wild Aces

2022 Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League · Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-30Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Toosdhi Jackson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-05vs MAC StatonWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Lisa Greenberg vs Chitra Chavan / Carolyn Martin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-16vs Twin Hickory Squad (Asthana)Won 20
W#1 Female DoublesJen Waller / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Rashelle Hayes / Ioana Petrar6-1, 6-0
W#2 Female DoublesBrittany Krebs / Toosdhi Jackson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-10vs Woodlake MorrisonSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Myrna Abed vs Kathleen Laroche / Laura Brawley6-2, 7-5
L#3 Female DoublesBrittany Krebs / Toosdhi Jackson vs Taryn Giroux / Lisa Elliott0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-02vs Kings Charter ThummaWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesJulia Preusser / Brittany Krebs vs Tracy Surratt / Terri McCormick6-0, 6-2
2022-04-25vs RCC ArmstrongWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Ariana Dickens vs Penny Lobred / Katheryn Enters6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Female Doubles 80%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Elham Tavassoli
published 3.5
3.27
Brittany Krebs
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Stacy McLeod
published
2.79
Ariana Dickens
published 3
2.77
Heather DeBolt
published 3
2.37
Julia Preusser
published
2.35
Nancy Tickle
published
Myrna Abed
published
Toosdhi Jackson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Elham Tavassoli
59W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Brittany Krebs
99W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Stacy McLeod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Ariana Dickens
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Heather DeBolt
24W–32L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Julia Preusser
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.37
Nancy Tickle
3W–15L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.35
Myrna Abed
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Toosdhi Jackson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.