Teams

Myers, Chad

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Nguyen, TamWon 30
W#1 DoublesConner Fudge / Brad Youngblood vs Charles Bailey / Sourav Dutta6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBryan Barksdale / Jonathan Sims vs Doug Burgess / Travis Donald6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBryce Ishee / Smith Lyon vs Andrei Gregory / Christian Medina6-2, 6-2
2026-08-20vs Hosemann, JDWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Purvis / Brad Youngblood vs Bryton Hixson / Ben Berry6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Haile / Smith Lyon vs Greg McNair / Bain Foote6-1, 6-2
2026-08-06vs Nguyen, TamWon 30
W#1 DoublesConner Fudge / Jonathan Sims vs Jason McKnatt / Charles Bailey6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaige Purvis / Adam Byrd vs Doug Burgess / Christian Medina6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Haile / Chad Myers vs Albert Smith / Andrei Gregory0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hosemann, JD2042450
2Myers, Chad1030111
3Nguyen, Tam02151057

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Conner Fudge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Bryan Barksdale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Niven Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Paige Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Adam Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Jonathan Sims
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Chad Myers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Smith Lyon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Brad Youngblood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Byrd + Chad Myers6088% games+27.5% vs expected
Adam Byrd + Jonathan Sims9266% games+7.2% vs expected
Brad Youngblood + Chad Myers7161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Conner Fudge
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Bryan Barksdale
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Niven Walker
32W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Paige Purvis
49W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Adam Byrd
77W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Jonathan Sims
74W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Chad Myers
58W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Smith Lyon
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Brad Youngblood
43W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.