Teams

Erwin/Kephart

2025 Neb. Mixed 40&Over · 7.0 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-09vs TongWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoss Jensen / LiQin Kephart vs Jeff VanRoy / Teri Barnard4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSri Vijay Yellepeddi / Julia Elkin vs Ying Zhang / Kirsten Holm-Caskey1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSatya Maddipati / Nicolette Diamantis vs Andy Wang / Shannon Gilroy2-6, 4-6
2025-04-25vs BlakeLost 12
W#1 DoublesLiQin Kephart / Ross Jensen vs Brandi Goldapp / Dale Dixon2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicolette Diamantis / Jonathan Hernandez vs Alice Blake / Mike Gardner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulia Elkin / Chad Redding vs Heather Siebken / Brandon Vasholz2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-18vs TongWon 21
W#1 DoublesSri Vijay Yellepeddi / Molly Hunt-Spisak vs Andy Wang / Amanda Dana7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesScott Lilleskov / Lori Schmaderer vs Jeff VanRoy / Teri Barnard1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Studts / Satya Maddipati vs Melissa Hass / Dimitrios Katsavelis6-3, 7-5
2025-04-04vs BlakeWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Schmaderer / Scott Lilleskov vs Brandi Goldapp / Dale Dixon3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Hunt-Spisak / Sri Vijay Yellepeddi vs Karen Andresen / Lane Andresen6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiQin Kephart / Ross Jensen vs Heather Siebken / Roger Penland6-2, 6-2
2025-03-14vs BlakeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLiQin Kephart / Ross Jensen vs Heather Siebken / Dale Dixon2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChad Redding / Julia Elkin vs Matthew Bendler / Angela Bendler6-4, 7-5
2025-03-07vs TongWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hernandez / Nicolette Diamantis vs Jennifer Christensen / Ying Zhang6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSatya Maddipati / Amy Studts vs Andy Wang / Melissa Hass2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoss Jensen / LiQin Kephart vs Johnny Hass / Sandra Zebrowski6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Strawhecker/40&Over/7.0X50141495
2Erwin/Kephart4211719170
3Korte2461225174
4Sands/Lefler1441123160
5Tong1571122168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Ross Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.59
Scott Lilleskov
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.58
Molly Hunt-Spisak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.57
Julia Elkin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.46
Satya Maddipati
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Amy Studts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.24
Lori Schmaderer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Sheetal Munjewar
published
3.13
Rebecca McCrery
published
3.08
Nicolette Diamantis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Sri Vijay Yellepeddi
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.84
LiQin Kephart
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Chad Redding
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Gina Alati
published
Jonathan Hernandez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Hunt-Spisak + Ross Jensen8165% games+14.9% vs expected
LiQin Kephart + Ross Jensen7160% games+9.6% vs expected
Lori Schmaderer + Scott Lilleskov4557% games−2.7% vs expected
LiQin Kephart + Sri Vijay Yellepeddi4171% gamesnot enough data
Lori Schmaderer + Satya Maddipati303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ross Jensen
103W–71L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Scott Lilleskov
58W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Molly Hunt-Spisak
99W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Julia Elkin
87W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Satya Maddipati
90W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
4
Amy Studts
50W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Lori Schmaderer
78W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Sheetal Munjewar
26W–20L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Rebecca McCrery
34W–44L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Nicolette Diamantis
46W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Sri Vijay Yellepeddi
21W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
LiQin Kephart
83W–55L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Chad Redding
19W–12L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Gina Alati
37W–51L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Hernandez
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.