Teams

Yadkin/Dellis/18 2.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 2.5 - Tuesday Night

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-05vs Yadkin/Nobel/18 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesAmanda Crews vs Alexa Florencio6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJustine Maher vs Leana Brown6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKatherine McPherson vs Valerie Faison6-4
2025-07-22vs Yadkin/Alejandra/18 2.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesJillaine Dellis vs Brittany Nicosia6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKatherine McPherson vs Maria Alejandra Forero Martinez6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesEmery Bencini vs Maria Acuin7-5, 6-0
2025-07-15vs Yadkin/Nobel/18 2.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesJillaine Dellis vs Valerie Faison6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAmanda Crews vs Sarah Barr6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesPatricia Townsend vs Janice Tsoules0-6, 0-6
2025-07-01vs Yadkin/Alejandra/18 2.5 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmanda Crews vs Rebecca Smitherman6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEmery Bencini vs Brittany Nicosia6-0, 6-1
2025-06-28vs Yadkin/Nobel/18 2.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesJustine Maher vs Valerie Faison6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKatherine McPherson vs Joann Binkley6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesPatricia Townsend vs Leah Nobel6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Yadkin/Alejandra/18 2.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJillaine Dellis vs Rebecca Smitherman6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEmery Bencini vs Kavya Kannan6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesPatricia Townsend vs Maria Alejandra Forero Martinez4-6, 1-6
2025-06-03vs Yadkin/Nobel/18 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJillaine Dellis vs Leana Brown6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesPatricia Townsend vs Joann Binkley6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJustine Maher vs Emily Mccord6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 - Tuesday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Justine Maher
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.60
Amanda Crews
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.48
Jillaine Dellis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.37
Katherine McPherson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Emery Bencini
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.20
Patricia Townsend
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justine Maher
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Amanda Crews
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.60
Jillaine Dellis
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Katherine McPherson
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Emery Bencini
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Townsend
7W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.