Teams

RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW8.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 8.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.31 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Noa Ramo-Larios
published
Bec Heinrich
published 4.5
4.25
Chandra Thomas
published 4.5
4.23
Nicole Goridkov
published
4.22
Kiran F Narsinh
published
4.15
Elani Phan
published 5
4.05
Donna Himenez
published 4
4.00
Jill Schepmann
published
3.91
Caitlin Finnell
published 4.5
3.90
Kelsey Palmer
published
3.89
Nancy Wilson
published
3.86
Flor Salinas
published 4
3.83
Mika Tsuchiiwa
published
3.81
Jill Van Slyke
published
3.76
Vanessa Garcia
published
3.71
Babe Franey
published 4
3.65
Ashley Bernstein
published 4
3.57
Nancy Jing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chandra Thomas + Noa Ramo-Larios3346% games+1.5% vs expected
Donna Himenez + Nancy Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Wilson + Jill Van Slyke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
4.44
4.5
Bec Heinrich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
Nicole Goridkov
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
4.22
5
Elani Phan
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
4.15
4
Donna Himenez
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
Jill Schepmann
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
Caitlin Finnell
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.91
Kelsey Palmer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
Nancy Wilson
19W–27L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Flor Salinas
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
Mika Tsuchiiwa
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.83
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.81
Vanessa Garcia
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Babe Franey
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Ashley Bernstein
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Nancy Jing
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.