Teams

Z.Nelson RRC

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarlos Garcia-Shelton / Allan Badulis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-18vs B.Kessler 5.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesPraveen Chandrasekhar / Joshua Franceschina vs Brandon Kessler / Drew Slocum6-2, 6-3
2023-05-07vs J.PreissWon 10
W#1 DoublesPraveen Chandrasekhar / Joshua Franceschina vs Jon Davis / Dan Parham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-30vs J.Byrd/R.TewariSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPraveen Chandrasekhar / Antonio O'Connell vs Justin Panepinto / Henry Pinyan4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Jeffrey Fadool vs Nicholas Camilleri / Mattias Hartmann7-5, 6-1
2023-04-23vs B.Kessler 5.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Fadool / Carlos Garcia-Shelton vs Brandon Kessler / Drew Slocum2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-16vs J.PreissLost 01
L#2 DoublesPraveen Chandrasekhar / Matthew McEvoy vs John Preiss / James McCaskill6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-02vs J.Byrd/R.TewariLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Fadool / Joshua Franceschina vs Matthew Rowe / Jake McCartney5-7, 4-6
2023-03-19vs B.Kessler 5.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Fadool / Carlos Garcia-Shelton vs Jarod Styres / Brandon Kessler6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZachary Nelson / Praveen Chandrasekhar vs Drew Slocum / Matt Skelly4-6, 5-7
2023-03-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Nelson / Praveen Chandrasekhar vs Tyler Brice / Mattias Hartmann6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Joshua Franceschina
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.32
Praveen Chandrasekhar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Allan Badulis
published 4.5
4.31
Jeffrey Fadool
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Ben Glass
published 4.5
4.14
Carlos Garcia-Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Drew Sandri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlos Garcia-Shelton + Praveen Chandrasekhar2644% games−6.6% vs expected
Joshua Franceschina + Jeffrey Fadool3445% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Garcia-Shelton + Jeffrey Fadool3248% gamesnot enough data
Ben Glass + Praveen Chandrasekhar224 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Franceschina + Praveen Chandrasekhar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Joshua Franceschina
79W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.81
4.5
Praveen Chandrasekhar
139W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Allan Badulis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Jeffrey Fadool
20W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Ben Glass
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Carlos Garcia-Shelton
117W–126L career · 9 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
Drew Sandri
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.