Teams

GJTC LCRESPIN

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - WS · MEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - WS

4 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs GJTC JD'ANNIBALESplit 11
W#1 Male DoublesTarrell Rodrigues / Whit Blair vs Braden Kappius / Sid Nittala6-3, 6-2
L#2 Male SinglesKarsten Bump vs James Dannibale1-6, 1-6
2022-07-12vs GJTC JD'ANNIBALESplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesLevi Crespin / Tarrell Rodrigues vs James Dannibale / Kevin McGuinness7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 Male SinglesKarsten Bump vs Braden Kappius6-3, 6-3
2022-06-28vs GJTC JD'ANNIBALESplit 11
W#1 Male DoublesKarsten Bump / Whit Blair vs Braden Kappius / Kevin McGuinness6-4, 6-2
L#1 Male SinglesTarrell Rodrigues vs James Dannibale1-6, 5-7
2022-06-21vs GJTC JD'ANNIBALEWon 21
W#1 Male DoublesKarsten Bump / Levi Crespin vs Braden Kappius / Sid Nittala6-3, 6-2
L#1 Male SinglesWhit Blair vs James Dannibale3-6, 3-6
W#2 Male SinglesTarrell Rodrigues vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-14vs GJTC JD'ANNIBALEWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesTarrell Rodrigues / Karsten Bump vs Sid Nittala / James Dannibale6-4, 6-4
W#1 Male SinglesWhit Blair vs Kevin McGuinness7-5, 6-1
2022-06-07vs GJTC JD'ANNIBALEWon 21
W#1 Male DoublesWhit Blair / Levi Crespin vs Kevin McGuinness / Braden Kappius6-3, 6-2
W#1 Male SinglesTarrell Rodrigues vs James Dannibale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 Male SinglesKarsten Bump vs Sid Nittala5-7, 0-6
2022-05-31vs GJTC JD'ANNIBALEWon 21
L#1 Male DoublesLevi Crespin / Karsten Bump vs James Dannibale / Braden Kappius6-7, 2-6
W#1 Male SinglesTarrell Rodrigues vs Kevin McGuinness4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 Male SinglesWhit Blair vs Sid Nittala6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC LCRESPIN4312920185
2GJTC JD'ANNIBALE3491225189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Whit Blair
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Singles 33% · published 4
3.31
Karsten Bump
usually #1 Male Doubles 57%, also #2 Male Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.30
Tarrell Rodrigues
usually #1 Male Singles 43%, also #1 Male Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Levi Crespin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Whit Blair
44W–34L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
3.5
Karsten Bump
60W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Tarrell Rodrigues
62W–41L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Levi Crespin
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.