Teams

Sweet Shots 2.5

2026 18&Over Women · 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-12vs NJ: Queen City AngelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Adriano / Lisa Davis vs Armida Tarquinio / Mistilee Pasigos2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSharon Jones vs Lisa Kureczka3-2
W#2 DoublesBrenda Brown / Felicia McNeil vs Bridget DiDonato / Veronica Taylor6-3, 6-4
2026-06-28vs NJ: Queen City AngelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaitlyn Cassis / Brenda Brown vs Lisa Kureczka / Kara Zlotnick3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRadha Kumar vs Sofia Caamano5-7, 1-6
2026-06-21vs NJ: Queen City AngelsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrenda Brown / Pamela Adriano vs Armida Tarquinio / Jennifer Su0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRadha Kumar vs Virmar Sosa1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShenaz Halani / Felicia McNeil vs Heather Kalish / Sapna Shah3-6, 3-6
2026-06-14vs NJ: Queen City AngelsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJenise Beaman vs Virmar Sosa3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Jones / Brenda Brown vs Michelle Clark / Sapna Shah7-5, 1-5
2026-06-07vs NJ: Queen City AngelsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenise Beaman / Lisa Davis vs Mistilee Pasigos / Virmar Sosa6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaitlyn Cassis vs Armida Tarquinio3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFelicia McNeil / Nazira Bhayani-dada vs Bridget DiDonato / Heather Kalish7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-31vs NJ: Queen City AngelsLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Adriano / WenCha Feng vs Lisa Kureczka / Jennifer Su5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSharon Jones vs Sofia Caamano3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Brown / Felicia McNeil vs Virmar Sosa / Robbie Bloom1-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs NJ: Queen City AngelsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrenda Brown / Jenise Beaman vs Armida Tarquinio / Sapna Shah7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs NJ: Queen City AngelsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSierra Thomas / Kaitlyn Cassis vs Lisa Kureczka / Mistilee Pasigos6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRadha Kumar / Jie Zhu vs Michelle Clark / Heather Kalish6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.17
WenCha Feng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Kaitlyn Cassis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.15
Sharon Jones
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.09
Pamela Adriano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.08
Brenda Brown
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Radha Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.02
Jenise Beaman
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
1.87
Felicia McNeil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Nikki Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Adriano + Kaitlyn Cassis2343% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Adriano + Radha Kumar134 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Brown + Felicia McNeil123 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Brown + Jenise Beaman123 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Brown + Kaitlyn Cassis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

WenCha Feng
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Kaitlyn Cassis
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Sharon Jones
6W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Pamela Adriano
4W–24L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Brenda Brown
4W–25L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Radha Kumar
3W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Jenise Beaman
7W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Felicia McNeil
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Nikki Thompson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.