Teams

Reedy, Mark

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.07 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-09-28vs Hanover, ScottSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEric Jay / Nate Arnold vs Blake Thorne / Tristan Houchin6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMark Reedy / William Zung vs Christopher Fields / Daniel Knox2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Davis Steadman
published 4.5
4.17
Eric Jay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
William Zung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Russell Packard
published
3.79
Nate Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Bob Warkentine
published 4
Brian Harris
published 4
Chris Wilson
published 4
3.71
Eric Giroux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Kurt Davids
published
3.60
Nick Jaimez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Cooper Wright
published 3.5
Liam Bigbee
published
Mark Reedy
published
Stephen Lunsford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Davids + William Zung5066% games+8.0% vs expected
Liam Bigbee + Davis Steadman6163% games+5.6% vs expected
Russell Packard + William Zung8357% games+5.4% vs expected
Eric Jay + William Zung16660% games+5.1% vs expected
Kurt Davids + Russell Packard4357% games+1.7% vs expected
Eric Jay + Nate Arnold6549% games+0.7% vs expected
Russell Packard + Mark Reedy2348% games−2.9% vs expected
Nick Jaimez + Eric Giroux4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Davis Steadman
35W–16L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Eric Jay
54W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
William Zung
72W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
Russell Packard
44W–44L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Nate Arnold
52W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Bob Warkentine
63W–51L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Brian Harris
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Wilson
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Eric Giroux
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Kurt Davids
65W–34L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Nick Jaimez
43W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Cooper Wright
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Liam Bigbee
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Reedy
6W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Lunsford
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.