Teams

40 LOVE

2025 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-14vs Cedar SprintWon 20
W#1 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Belinda Oh6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Solander vs Cheryl Risell6-1, 6-4
2025-09-13vs Cedar SprintLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Jessica Lai6-7
2025-09-07vs Cedar SprintWon 21
W#1 SinglesSabrina Leguizamon vs Kirah Yen7-6, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMacon Field vs Belinda Oh2-6, 2-2
W#3 SinglesNatilee Festa vs Mai-Lien Fruge6-1, 5-3
2025-08-17vs Cedar SprintWon 30
W#1 SinglesNatilee Festa vs Cheryl Risell6-3, 4-4
W#2 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Mindy Blakney6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesStephanie Pitts vs Kirah Yen6-1, 6-2
2025-08-16vs Cedar SprintWon 30
W#1 SinglesNatilee Festa vs Jessica Lai6-3, 1-2
W#2 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Mai-Lien Fruge6-0, 6-6
W#3 SinglesStephanie Pitts vs Belinda Oh6-3, 6-1
2025-08-10vs Cedar SprintWon 30
W#1 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Cameron Craig6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Solander vs Cheryl Risell7-6, 5-3
W#3 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Jasmine Mason7-5, 2-0
2025-08-02vs Cedar SprintWon 30
W#1 SinglesKristin Quackenbush vs Cameron Craig6-4, 2-1
W#2 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Jessica Lai6-3, 2-1
W#3 SinglesStephanie Pitts vs Belinda Oh6-2, 6-3
2025-07-27vs Cedar SprintWon 21
W#1 SinglesSabrina Leguizamon vs Kirah Yen6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStephanie Pitts vs Jasmine Mason6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMacon Field vs Anna Laudiero3-6, 5-3
2025-07-26vs Cedar SprintWon 20
W#1 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Mai-Lien Fruge6-2, 1-1
W#2 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Mindy Blakney6-1, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
140 LOVE092258140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Stephanie Pitts
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.92
Elizabeth Solander
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.92
Jemine Bryon
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.89
Natilee Festa
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.83
Alexis McCary
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.69
Sabrina Leguizamon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kristin Quackenbush
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Macon Field
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Pitts
58W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.10
4
Elizabeth Solander
226W–123L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
Jemine Bryon
56W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Natilee Festa
39W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Alexis McCary
143W–108L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Sabrina Leguizamon
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Macon Field
31W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.