Teams

MTC Downing 8.0

2023 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-27vs CCV BencksWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Downing / Joy Lareau vs Nancy Young / Marion Halladay6-2, 6-4
2023-07-18vs HCC WalshWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoy Lareau / Thayer Baird vs Debra Carter / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-10vs CCV BencksLost 01
L#3 DoublesNorma Kimbrel / Joy Lareau vs Teresa Whitworth / Susan Trigg3-6, 1-6
2023-06-29vs Burkwood KampingaLost 01
L#1 DoublesNorma Kimbrel / Joy Lareau vs Christine Polk / Rochelle Purmasir6-7, 1-6
2023-06-19vs ACAC StallardWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Euen / Joy Lareau vs Kimberly Giancaspro / Ella Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-15vs Belmont ColginWon 10
W#3 DoublesErin Euen / Joy Lareau vs Lee Moore / Jane Riddle6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Janice McGarity
published 4.5
3.77
Cindy Eramian
published 4
3.74
Joy Lareau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Diana Duddy
published 4
3.34
Erin Euen
published
3.32
Laurie Miller
published
Marilyn Downing
published
Maureen McGrath
published
Nancy Reynolds
published
Norma Kimbrel
published
Susan Nothnagle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen McGrath + Cindy Eramian5060% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Downing + Nancy Reynolds134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Nothnagle + Nancy Reynolds303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Janice McGarity
70W–56L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Cindy Eramian
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Joy Lareau
84W–99L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Diana Duddy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Erin Euen
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
Laurie Miller
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.32
Marilyn Downing
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maureen McGrath
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Reynolds
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Norma Kimbrel
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Nothnagle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.