Teams

FOOTHILLS TandS 18AW4.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Kyoko Hubbard
published
4.21
Lynette van Dell
published
4.19
Tula Kraiser
published
4.17
Karen Cannon
published
4.16
Tracy Cowperthwaite
published
4.14
Sumeeta Vasishta
published
4.08
Ann Jaquith
published 4.5
4.08
Kristi Oberhauser
published
4.06
Elisabetta Gaiani
published 4.5
4.05
Keri Nicholas
published
4.04
Stefanie Bray
published
4.02
Jodi Andrews
published
3.99
Haruko Kurata
published 4.5
3.87
Vivian Gunnerengen
published
3.86
Elizabeth Wolfe
published 4
3.85
Sofia Yoshimoto
published
3.75
Gina Jorasch
published 4
Jatica Pollack
published
Kathy Leung-Mah
published
Morgan Bricca
published
Sharon Yang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Bray + Kristi Oberhauser1542% games−1.8% vs expected
Vivian Gunnerengen + Jodi Andrews044 matchesnot enough data
Lynette van Dell + Kathy Leung-Mah033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyoko Hubbard
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.21
Lynette van Dell
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.21
Tula Kraiser
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
4.19
Karen Cannon
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
4.17
Tracy Cowperthwaite
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
4.16
Sumeeta Vasishta
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Ann Jaquith
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
Kristi Oberhauser
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Elisabetta Gaiani
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
Keri Nicholas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
Stefanie Bray
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.04
Jodi Andrews
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Haruko Kurata
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
Vivian Gunnerengen
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.87
4
Elizabeth Wolfe
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Sofia Yoshimoto
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Carol Lobitz-Stearns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Gina Jorasch
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Jatica Pollack
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Leung-Mah
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Morgan Bricca
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Yang
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.