Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5W NCL Wausau Hackman/Liss

2024 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesDonna Hackman / Adrienne Liss-Gravemade vs Joyce Krusa / Chelsea Willes6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Palecek vs Tara Cooper2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy King / Kay Palmer vs Michele Newman / Joan Frericks1-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesDonna Hackman / Adrienne Liss-Gravemade vs Jessica Mills / Pam Weider6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Palecek vs Nikki Sommers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Mccrackin / Kathy King vs Brooke Filtz / Meredith Congdon4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Carter / Kay Palmer vs Danuta Kurczewski / Sarah Wrasse4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesDonna Hackman / Adrienne Liss-Gravemade vs Jessica Mills / Brooke Filtz6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathy King / Mary Mccrackin vs Nikki Sommers / Danuta Kurczewski7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesConnie Gliniecki / Ginny Suchocki vs Meredith Congdon / Hannah Congdon7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDonna Hackman / Adrienne Liss-Gravemade vs Tanya Barth / Tara Cooper6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Palecek vs Joan Frericks6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Mccrackin / Jeni Seidel vs Donna Hansen / Michele Newman3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Gliniecki / Kay Palmer vs Nicole Krolak / Chelsea Willes2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDonna Hackman / Kathy King vs Pam Weider / Meghan Busa5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGinny Suchocki vs Brooke Filtz1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCamille Nicklaus / Mary Mccrackin vs La Rue Davison / Danuta Kurczewski4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Palecek / Kay Palmer vs Meredith Congdon / Sarah Wrasse6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDonna Hackman / Adrienne Liss-Gravemade vs Tanya Barth / Sandy Stargardt6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Palecek vs Joan Frericks6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Mccrackin / Jeni Seidel vs Tara Cooper / Donna Hansen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesConnie Gliniecki / Carolyn Carter vs Joyce Krusa / Michele Newman7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adrienne Liss-Gravemade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carolyn Carter
published 3.5
Connie Gliniecki
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Camille Nicklaus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Donna Hackman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ginny Suchocki
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jeni Seidel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Palecek
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Kay Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Mccrackin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Hackman + Adrienne Liss-Gravemade9168% games+14.9% vs expected
Kay Palmer + Mary Mccrackin3254% games−4.8% vs expected
Connie Gliniecki + Ginny Suchocki033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adrienne Liss-Gravemade
15W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carolyn Carter
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Connie Gliniecki
6W–9L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Camille Nicklaus
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Donna Hackman
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ginny Suchocki
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeni Seidel
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Palecek
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kay Palmer
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Mccrackin
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.