Teams

4CC DETROIT-SHIELD 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F1

2024 SEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-20vs 5TROY-LI 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F1Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelanie Shield / Timothy Shield vs Nick Dupree / Kelsey Waugh6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVanessa Lindow / Ted Pryor vs Jennifer Catron / Charles Miller1-6, 3-6
2024-08-13vs 2BERK-MARTINI 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM FLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaja Ashkar / Claudia Ashkar vs Richard Buttermore / MacKenzie Miller6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShawn Coyle / Bridget Sherer vs Wendy Buttermore / Alan Longstreet6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTed Pryor / Vanessa Lindow vs Gunnar Holmes / Patti Martini5-7, 2-6
2024-08-06vs 1BCC-STRACHAN 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesClaudia Ashkar / Raja Ashkar vs Jodi Iacco / Lou DeBoer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVanessa Lindow / Spencer Hughes vs Stephanie Davis / Patrick Lee4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Parker / Bridget Sherer vs Kimberly Strachan / William Strachan2-6, 1-6
2024-07-19vs 6BOH-VONDELL 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F1Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelanie Shield / Timothy Shield vs Sarkis Toroyan / Kim Baslock6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChad Krueger / Katy Krueger vs Bart Feys / Michelle O'Neill2-6, 1-6
2024-06-28vs 5TROY-LI 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRaja Ashkar / Claudia Ashkar vs Joe Bulka / Geri Bulka6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSpencer Hughes / Bridget Sherer vs Dan Lawrence / Kelsey Waugh5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChad Krueger / Katy Krueger vs David Proefke / Sara Kenez4-6, 1-6
2024-06-21vs 2BERK-MARTINI 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM FWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Watkins / Eliza Getz vs Richard Buttermore / Kathleen Ward6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRaja Ashkar / Claudia Ashkar vs Kent Martini / Patti Martini6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChad Krueger / Katy Krueger vs Gunnar Holmes / Jacquelyn Bovee2-6, 6-7
2024-06-14vs 1BCC-STRACHAN 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEliza Getz / Spencer Hughes vs Stephanie Davis / Patrick Lee6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Parker / Bridget Sherer vs Emily Janz / Ryan Janz7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTed Pryor / Ulrike Sherer vs Jennifer Berk-King / Vick Kheny1-6, 0-6
2024-06-07vs 6BOH-VONDELL 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRaja Ashkar / Claudia Ashkar vs Adriana Chitoiu / James Ranta6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaty Krueger / Chad Krueger vs Cindy Cole / Del Scheer2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesUlrike Sherer / Myron Sherer vs Sarah Cvetanovski / James Salk3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Vanessa Lindow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Bridget Sherer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Chad Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Claudia Ashkar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Eliza Getz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katy Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Gregory
published
Melanie Shield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Myron Sherer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Raja Ashkar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Shawn Coyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Spencer Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ted Pryor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Timothy Shield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ulrike Sherer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Ashkar + Raja Ashkar5077% gamesnot enough data
Chad Krueger + Katy Krueger044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vanessa Lindow
100W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Bridget Sherer
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Chad Krueger
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Claudia Ashkar
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eliza Getz
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Watkins
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Katy Krueger
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Gregory
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Shield
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Myron Sherer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Raja Ashkar
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shawn Coyle
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Spencer Hughes
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ted Pryor
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Shield
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ulrike Sherer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.