Teams

King/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-16vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesAllison King / Catalina Knutson vs Danielle Kwasnik / Jill Hoschette6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKim Ewing vs Georgia Rae Rainer6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Spurgin / Kristin Monge vs Debi English / Sarah Lown1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Elison vs LOURDES BLANDINO7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTracy Collins / Lauren Huston vs Patsy Fischer / Sharon Clark6-2, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Williams/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesAllison King / Catalina Knutson vs Kristi Leach / Julie Harano6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennifer McVeigh vs Elena Burns6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMorgan Cupp / Abigail Osborne vs Julia Slagle / Annie Adams2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Ewing / Kristin Monge vs Brooke Williams / Victoria Sissom4-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesTracy Collins / Abigail Osborne vs Santana Ewers / Lexie Hill4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKim Ewing vs Sara Wallingford2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEmily Elison / Laura Spurgin vs Brooke Browning / Christina Kaak5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer McVeigh vs Morgan Smith6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Davis / Kristin Monge vs Leigh Henderson / Lisa Perkey4-6, 6-7
2026-04-11vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesAbigail Osborne / Emily Elison vs Jennifer Bell / Georgia Rae Rainer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTracy Collins / Lauren Huston vs Isabel Cunningham / Patsy Fischer5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKim Ewing vs Gabriella Rimmer7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Monge / Ginny Davis vs LOURDES BLANDINO / Sharon Clark7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Williams/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Elena Burns4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Spurgin / Abigail Osborne vs Brooke Williams / Nazo Burgy7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Kristin Monge vs Julie Harano / Kristi Leach6-4, 6-1
2026-03-21vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Spurgin / Abigail Osborne vs Christina Kaak / Deanna Unger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGinny Davis / Morgan Cupp vs Leigh Henderson / Lisa Perkey0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Jennifer McVeigh vs Joan Ewers / Santana Ewers0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Abigail Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Kim Ewing
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.59
Emily Elison
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Catalina Knutson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Ginny Davis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Morgan Cupp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Lauren Huston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Lori DeRoos
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.38
Jennifer McVeigh
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.35
Laura Spurgin
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.29
Kristin Monge
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Elison + Lauren Huston6558% games+8.8% vs expected
Kristin Monge + Emily Elison8067% games+7.8% vs expected
Abigail Osborne + Laura Spurgin213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Elison + Laura Spurgin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abigail Osborne
43W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Kim Ewing
29W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Emily Elison
172W–110L career · 5 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Catalina Knutson
127W–129L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
4
Ginny Davis
15W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.45
Morgan Cupp
21W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Lauren Huston
35W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lori DeRoos
31W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Jennifer McVeigh
17W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Laura Spurgin
66W–46L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kristin Monge
28W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.