Teams

A5 Burkwood Colgin

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-13vs A4 Avalon GeorgeWon 10
W#2 DoublesJane Colgin / Tyler Sinsabaugh vs Deborah Mason / Frank Mason6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-06vs A2 MRTC Battery Park HawleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Denunzio / Tyler Sinsabaugh vs Carolyn Hawley / Jeffrey Johnson6-2, 6-2
2022-10-30vs A9 Woodlake O'DonnellWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathy Denunzio / Samuel Poole vs Mikhil Sanduria / Jasmine Kaur7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Colgin / Mark Hudson vs Beth Bell / Thomas Brown6-3, 7-5
2022-10-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesJane Colgin / Tyler Sinsabaugh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-10vs A1 ACAC SinghLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Colgin / Tyler Sinsabaugh vs Darren Golden / Diane Linderman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-09vs A3 Dominion ShermanWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Denunzio / Tyler Sinsabaugh vs Timothy Sherman / Annmarie Lobred6-2, 6-3
2022-09-18vs A8 Willow Oaks DuntonLost 01
L#2 DoublesTyler Sinsabaugh / Melissa Stewart vs James Dunton / Yancey Haas4-6, 5-4, 0-1
2022-09-11vs A6 MAC Snow 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Denunzio / Samuel Poole vs John Bennett / Katie Hambrick6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.14
Erin Decker
published 4.5
4.07
LUDINEI PICELLI
published
4.04
Tyler Sinsabaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.75
Kathy Denunzio
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.31
Jane Colgin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.71
Andrew Powell
published 3
Joseph Golden
published
Mark Hudson
published
Melissa Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Colgin + Tyler Sinsabaugh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Erin Decker
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.14
LUDINEI PICELLI
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Tyler Sinsabaugh
141W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Kathy Denunzio
125W–93L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Jane Colgin
160W–148L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3
Andrew Powell
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Joseph Golden
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Hudson
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Stewart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.