Teams

Chapman

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jennifer Stevenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Emma Scherzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Gram / Jennifer Stevenson vs Alma Siri / Maria Siri6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesRosella Leahy / Madeleine Bourland vs Sandy Christiansen / Pamela Meyer6-1, 6-1
2023-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesRosella Leahy / Barbara Gram vs Manisha Thakkar / Theresa Hagerty6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Ringelberg / Jennifer Stevenson vs Monique Gill / Kourtnie Katayama1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Barbara Gram vs Lisa Hockman / Mai-Anh Nguyen6-1, 6-0
2023-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Madeleine Bourland vs Ann-Marie Lundberg / Rachel Nies2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Anna Ringelberg vs Karen Kraus / Christine Egan6-4, 6-4
2023-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Miwako Kobayashi / Ramya Gotety6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jennifer Stevenson
91W–97L career
0%96%4%
3.41
3.5
Emma Scherzer
21W–6L career
not enough data
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.