Teams

The Plantation - Haines

2022 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-08vs Deerwood - ChamberlainLost 02
L#1 DoublesFred Pensotti / Carlos Muniz vs Robb Chamberlain / Brendon Vavrica3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTim Baird / Raymond Wolpert vs Timothy Wall / Bojan Sapurik4-6, 4-6
2022-05-25vs SPRING - Van WesteringSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJosh Ezring / Carlos Muniz vs Eric van Westering / Eric Gebicke3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Baird / Raymond Wolpert vs Yair Brachiyahu / Thiagu Rajendran3-6, 3-6
2022-05-18vs San Jose - ZambettiLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarlos Muniz / Tim Baird vs Brian Crick / Richard Scott0-6, 1-6
2022-05-04vs Timuquana - RisdonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosh Ezring / Carlos Muniz vs Richard Crittenden / Phillip Gibbs4-6, 5-7
2022-04-27vs AldenLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Haines / Carlos Muniz vs Tim Fritz / Ashton Fritz3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFred Pensotti / Tim Baird vs Allen Foley / Kyle Whalen2-6, 2-6
2022-04-24vs Sawgrass - HerzfeldLost 01
L#2 DoublesFred Pensotti / Tim Baird vs John Fawcett / John Daly6-7, 5-7
2022-04-20vs Baymeadows - DevosLost 02
L#2 DoublesRaymond Wolpert / Tim Baird vs Paul Begley / Marcus Hodges0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Muniz / Richard Cunningham vs David Smyth / Ricardo Torres3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Fred Pensotti
published 4
3.88
Josh Ezring
published 4
3.83
Scott Haines
published 4
3.71
Carlos Muniz
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.39
Butch Reese
published 3.5
3.23
John Hanlon
published
3.10
Tim Baird
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlos Muniz + Butch Reese7073% games+10.3% vs expected
Scott Haines + Josh Ezring13758% games+1.9% vs expected
Scott Haines + Fred Pensotti9557% gamesnot enough data
Josh Ezring + Fred Pensotti8067% gamesnot enough data
Tim Baird + Scott Haines3449% gamesnot enough data
Scott Haines + John Hanlon4352% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Muniz + Josh Ezring2451% gamesnot enough data
Tim Baird + Carlos Muniz0530% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Fred Pensotti
107W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Josh Ezring
126W–92L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Scott Haines
182W–99L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
3.5
Carlos Muniz
96W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Butch Reese
16W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
John Hanlon
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.23
Tim Baird
29W–101L career · 6 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.