Teams

TDC Long

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-17vs Raintree StahlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Sheri Carlyle vs Valerie Caldwell / Carolyn Moncure6-4, 7-6
2022-06-15vs KRA FleckLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Limoges / Heidi Collier vs Emily Gravitt / Katy Hottinger5-7, 4-6
2022-06-08vs Westwood TowlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Limoges / Heidi Collier vs Colleen Quinn / Heather Harker7-6, 6-1
2022-06-06vs Stonehenge GoodreauWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Robin Cox vs Terri Estes / Zoe Emerson6-4, 7-5
2022-06-01vs Burkwood JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Long / Heidi Collier vs Kim Johnson / Tricia Jones5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-27vs WOCC PommersheimLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Davis / Heidi Collier vs Janet Pommersheim / Katherine Berry6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-05-25vs SCC NoblesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Limoges / Heidi Collier vs Beth Phipps / Sally Hurt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-20vs ACAC CamdenWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Long / Heidi Collier vs Patti Bryan / Susan Cheatham6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Heidi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Anna Gibellato
published 3.5
3.23
Sharon Moorefield
published
3.14
Sheri Carlyle
published
3.05
Michele Limoges
published
2.87
Eliza Causey
published 3
2.73
Kathleen Steiner
published
2.70
Becky Harper
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Carlyle + Heidi Collier4162% games+8.1% vs expected
Sheri Carlyle + Michele Limoges123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Collier
118W–82L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Anna Gibellato
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Moorefield
20W–19L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sheri Carlyle
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Michele Limoges
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Eliza Causey
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Kathleen Steiner
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Becky Harper
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.