Teams

LOCH.Waters

2023 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-12vs TOHS.JadiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesArthur Gloer / Brian Heaphy vs UTPAL JADIA / Jigar Shah3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-07vs TOC.StognerWon 20
W#1 DoublesArthur Gloer / Brian Heaphy vs Stephen Fu / Craig Brehmer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDan Robinson / Daryn Watson vs Matthew Capobianco / Johan Meurling7-6, 6-2
2023-04-23vs KF.DeFuscoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Daniel Moore vs Jimmy Lewis / Nathan Naramor3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesArthur Gloer vs Rob Dewberry4-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs TOC.MehraLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Daniel Moore vs Vamsee Pasangulapati / Mark Spining7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-19vs TOC.PuriLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Holsopple / Arthur Gloer vs Vishal Gupta / Jaipal Reddy Yasa1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Vipul Patel vs Nishant Puri / Siddhartha Pendharkar3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Dan Robinson
published 3.5
3.29
Brian Heaphy
published 3.5
3.28
Joseph Holsopple
published
3.11
Daryn Watson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Newsome
published 3.5
3.07
Vipul Patel
published
2.93
Arthur Gloer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.69
Kenneth Waters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Heaphy + Dan Robinson123 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Waters + Arthur Gloer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Robinson
12W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Brian Heaphy
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Joseph Holsopple
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Vipul Patel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Arthur Gloer
39W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.93
Kenneth Waters
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.