Teams

Pulley/Nashville

2026 Combo 55 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - WED AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 16 9:00 AM
Old Natchez Country Club
Sep 23 9:00 AM
Ensworth School
2026-09-02vs Ludington/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Agee / Jenny Barnes vs Shelly Wade / Marcia Harris6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaryBeth Comfort / Ann Manning vs Marcella Tudeen / Jeannie Tapley6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Barbara Tempkins vs Patricia Evans / Barbara Pisano6-1, 6-1
2026-08-26vs Ludington/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Fetherling / Rachel Brooks vs Susan Manley / Edith Nau6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnn Manning / MaryBeth Comfort vs Marcia Harris / Mary Brennan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristine Toriscelli / Tiffy Baur vs Shelly Wade / Barbara Pisano6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-19vs Rizor/Baker/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Agee / Brenda Mudter vs Victoria Adkins / Candice Alexander6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJenny Barnes / Angie Howard vs Kathy McCabe / Vicki Jacobs4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Vasil / Barbara Tempkins vs Linda Rizor / Cathy Radig6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Wade/Patrizio/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesRachel Brooks / Mary Fetherling vs Doris Grant / Carolyn Slandzicki4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Furman / MaryBeth Comfort vs Stacey Wade / Nicole Keenan3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Tempkins / Patti Barrett Wright vs Christy Sykes / Wendy Farley6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Mary Fetherling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Christine Toriscelli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Barbara Tempkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Angie Howard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Mary Agee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Stephanie Dunkle
published
3.11
Susan Furman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Leslie Magnotte
published
2.82
Amy Frankel Nau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Veronica Pulley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Brenda Mudter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
MaryBeth Comfort
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Patti Barrett Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Karen Vasil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jenny Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Tiffy Baur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Dunkle + Veronica Pulley213 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Magnotte + Susan Furman033 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Pulley + Angie Howard123 matchesnot enough data
Christine Toriscelli + Mary Fetherling303 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Barnes + Susan Furman123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fetherling + Susan Furman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Fetherling
26W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Christine Toriscelli
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Barbara Tempkins
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Angie Howard
14W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
Mary Agee
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Stephanie Dunkle
14W–19L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
Susan Furman
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Leslie Magnotte
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Amy Frankel Nau
20W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Veronica Pulley
18W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Brenda Mudter
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
MaryBeth Comfort
65W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Patti Barrett Wright
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Karen Vasil
13W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Jenny Barnes
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Tiffy Baur
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.27
Rachel Brooks
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.