Teams

CACM BLUE

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Kopp / Daniel Sloane vs Nancy Harnum / Michael Harnum7-5, 6-0
2024-05-18vs DTC GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Gralla / Patricia Olson vs Christopher Jackson / Jackie M Kotoch5-7, 4-6
2024-05-05vs GTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Kopp / Daniel Gralla vs Lynn Pearson / Jonathan Blackburn6-7, 3-6
2024-04-28vs CP GREENLost 02
L#2 DoublesPatricia Olson / Daniel Gralla vs Jessica Rae / Bruce Silver2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Kopp / Daniel Sloane vs Pallavi Marulasiddappa / ARTHUR VAUGHN2-6, 4-6
2024-04-21vs WP PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Kopp / Michael Peters vs Emma Tiernon / Peter Satagaj3-6, 0-6
2024-04-14vs SKY GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesKai Peters / Daniel Sloane vs Amy Raval / Jeffrey Raval6-4, 7-5
2024-04-07vs CM YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Olson / Daniel Gralla vs Kristen Robbins / Eric Robbins6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSarah Kopp / Daniel Sloane vs Romi Hovey / Glenn Rippey2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kai Peters
published
3.37
Kristin Nelson
published
3.33
Heather Mitchell
published
3.31
Daniel Gralla
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Patricia Olson
published
3.24
Barbara Hall
published 3.5
3.21
Daniel Sloane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Mark Thompson
published
3.21
Sarah Kopp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Richard Lynn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Kopp + Daniel Sloane111647% games−0.1% vs expected
Daniel Gralla + Patricia Olson41046% games−3.0% vs expected
Barbara Hall + Mark Thompson5351% games−3.2% vs expected
Daniel Gralla + Sarah Kopp033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kai Peters
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Kristin Nelson
43W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
Heather Mitchell
30W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Daniel Gralla
56W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Patricia Olson
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Barbara Hall
32W–19L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Daniel Sloane
40W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Mark Thompson
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Sarah Kopp
45W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Richard Lynn
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.