Teams

Nguyen, Thu

2022 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-06-16vs HOAWC/Edwards/18&Over3.5WLost 14
L#1 DoublesRegina Pfeifer / Pamela ODonnell vs Marti Huffman / Susan McConkey1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dvorak vs Marly McMillen0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJuleah Littrell / Thu Nguyen vs Lindsey Kalivoda / Melinda McCalla2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesTasha Kosanke vs Natasha Chappelle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Nulan / Julie Highfill vs Lynne Ornduff / Marcia Moroney0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Sarah Gerleman
published
3.27
Pamela ODonnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Dvorak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Tasha Kosanke
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Kelly Nulan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Faye Beets
published 3
Barbara Lawson
published
Juleah Littrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Highfill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Sanchez
published
Regina Pfeifer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Adamson
published
Thu Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thu Nguyen + Tasha Kosanke91245% games−3.0% vs expected
Tasha Kosanke + Kelly Nulan3348% games−4.9% vs expected
Mary Sanchez + Thu Nguyen1837% games−5.5% vs expected
Shannon Adamson + Regina Pfeifer01032% games−7.9% vs expected
Faye Beets + Julie Highfill33125% games−15.5% vs expected
Kelly Nulan + Barbara Lawson0919% games−18.3% vs expected
Pamela ODonnell + Kelly Nulan044 matchesnot enough data
Thu Nguyen + Regina Pfeifer044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Gerleman
50W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Pamela ODonnell
32W–66L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elizabeth Dvorak
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tasha Kosanke
38W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kelly Nulan
12W–66L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Faye Beets
3W–40L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Barbara Lawson
1W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Juleah Littrell
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Julie Highfill
3W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mary Sanchez
6W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Regina Pfeifer
9W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Shannon Adamson
4W–58L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thu Nguyen
19W–88L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.