Teams

GR-Haislip (18s 7.5W)

2026 Neuse River Combo 18 & Over · 18s 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 13 1:30 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
Sep 20 3:30 PM
Greenville Country Club
Oct 8 7:00 PM
New Bern Golf and Country Club
Oct 11 1:30 PM
Ole Porte Racquet Club
L#1 DoublesLauren Turbeville / Ashley Elise vs Sarah Corey / Maggie Warren6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Taylor Haislip / Megan Parker vs Sharyn Leaver / Catherine Boles4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-08-27vs GCC-Pons/Smith (18s 7.5W)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSamantha Taylor Haislip / Megan Parker vs Eleanor Kipp / Sabrina Lentz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Davis / Kascia Henderson vs Catherine Land / Cassidy Johnson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Turbeville / Whitney Musgrave vs Kerry Smith / Feng-Ling Wu2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJill Davis / Katie Strickland vs Wendy Stallings / Helen Tyson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Turbeville / Ashley Elise vs Caroline Corey / Sarah Corey4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSherry Smith / Ashley Elise vs Sandy Phillips / Abigail Altman6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJustine Barnes / Whitney Musgrave vs Mignon Ingram / Lauren Acosta1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Brann / Kascia Henderson vs Tracy Wilkinson / Aimee Braxton6-4, 6-1
2026-08-06vs GCC-Pons/Smith (18s 7.5W)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJustine Barnes / Becky Hare vs Molly Holton / Cassidy Johnson2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Brann / Ashley Elise vs Jamie Pasker / Kimberly Kuhn2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherry Smith / Katie Strickland vs Feng-Ling Wu / Diane Pons6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18s 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OP-Phil/Alt Not My Fault (18s 7.5W)2051239
2GR-Haislip (18s 7.5W)2163870
3GCC-Pons/Smith (18s 7.5W)0112425
4NB-Hink/Stall Looking for Tennis Joy (18s 7.5W)02061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Brooke Brann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Samantha Taylor Haislip
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Justine Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Lauren Turbeville
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Ashley Elise
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Whitney Musgrave
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Katie Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Becky Hare
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Kascia Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Hare + Whitney Musgrave4547% games−2.5% vs expected
Kascia Henderson + Ashley Elise3252% gamesnot enough data
Becky Hare + Justine Barnes3243% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Turbeville + Whitney Musgrave044 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Turbeville + Ashley Elise314 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Brann + Kascia Henderson303 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Musgrave + Justine Barnes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Brann
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Samantha Taylor Haislip
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Justine Barnes
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Lauren Turbeville
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Ashley Elise
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Whitney Musgrave
40W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Katie Strickland
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Becky Hare
19W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Kascia Henderson
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Megan Parker
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.