Teams

MEA RED

2021 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-21vs MEA GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Noyes / Shelley Gale vs Amanda Wember / Caroline Landry6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDevan Haas vs Shannon Ross6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKate Ruder / Susan Wu vs Kim Obert / Marianne Martin4-6, 4-6
2021-07-20vs BRMST NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Sznewajs / Kate Ruder vs Stella Mastrogiovanni / Lisa Francisco6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Kelly Walter1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDevan Haas / Lauren Noyes vs Leigh Harris / Jody Manning6-1, 6-1
2021-07-07vs TTA PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelley Gale / Devan Haas vs Brooke Platt / Ann Forte5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Nicole Giesen5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Ruder / Susan Wu vs Tanya Jones / Cynthia Davis6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-23vs CVTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Sznewajs / Shelley Gale vs Mindy Sawtelle / Marica Follett6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDevan Haas vs Amalia Hurtado7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKate Ruder / Lauren Noyes vs Xiaorui Li / Mary Campbell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-16vs NJ PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Sznewajs / Shelley Gale vs Kathleen Harvey / Holly McClure6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClaire Lochridge vs Kate Swift6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDevan Haas / Kate Ruder vs Denise Rivas / Melissa Sailer6-1, 6-1
2021-06-09vs RCC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesDevan Haas / Claire Lochridge vs Amelia Taljaard / Jennifer Flaherty1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Jennifer Gorrell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Noyes / Susan Wu vs Maggie White / Ann Marie White6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Mary Sznewajs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Lauren Noyes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Claire Lochridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Devan Haas
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Melissa Azer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Kate Ruder
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Shelley Gale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Noyes + Mary Sznewajs5076% games+10.5% vs expected
Mary Sznewajs + Melissa Azer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Sznewajs
59W–18L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.02
Lauren Noyes
33W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Claire Lochridge
40W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Devan Haas
17W–10L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Melissa Azer
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
2.63
Kate Ruder
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelley Gale
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.