Teams

KF.Scagnelli

2023 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-08vs MD.KempWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Martin / Christina Scagnelli vs Megan Redford / Amanda Jordan6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesErin Rabbitt / Rachel Garcia vs Andrea McIntosh / Sarah Kushner6-1, 3-0
W#3 DoublesDyvonne Ellis / Rebecca King vs Caroline Stallings / Laurie Godfrey6-0, 7-5
2023-07-24vs TOHS.LowranceLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Sarah Martin vs Colleen Sacco / Dianna Erwin6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDana Briggs / Dyvonne Ellis vs Audrey Hollett / Tracy Grasser0-6, 2-6
2023-07-22vs MD.KempSplit 11
W#2 DoublesErin Rabbitt / Rachel Garcia vs Andrea McIntosh / Bettyjean Moreau6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Lewis / Dyvonne Ellis vs Vanessa Braziel / Meredith Bayer4-6, 1-6
2023-06-26vs TOC.HugginsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Martin / Christina Scagnelli vs Suzanne Jeska / Angela Ray1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Garcia / Erin Rabbitt vs Gail Stone / Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-2, 7-6
2023-06-05vs APEX.TandradinataLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Jennifer Hellrung vs Kathleen Murray / Paula Dwyer1-6, 0-6
2023-05-29vs TOC.HutchensLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Martin / Christina Scagnelli vs Regina Davis / Shelly Jude3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErin Rabbitt / Jennifer Hellrung vs Sharon Herschman / Maureen Green6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaire Leland / Dyvonne Ellis vs Francine Pearce / Christine Hutchens2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Christina Scagnelli
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Jennifer Hellrung
published
2.80
Erin Rabbitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Claire Leland
published 3
2.71
Dana Briggs
published 3
2.65
Sarah Lewis
published
2.25
Dyvonne Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Scagnelli
110W–109L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jennifer Hellrung
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Erin Rabbitt
43W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Claire Leland
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Dana Briggs
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Sarah Lewis
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.65
2.5
Dyvonne Ellis
31W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.