Teams

Love All

Adult 55 and over · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.07 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-01-03vs Match MakersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKrista Marsh / Laura Ammermann vs Kathy Hulsizer / Ingrid Unternahrer4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Doherty / Gail Howard vs Debbie Anthony / Debbie Morgan7-5, 6-4
2025-12-13vs LV GalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristie Bower / Krista Marsh vs Janet JenningsOchs / Anabela Araujo4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Gotchel / Maria Swenson vs Margaret Albert / Maryann Baloh1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Pepe / Dixie Bender vs Christina Pacis / Kimberly Ganey2-6, 1-6
2025-12-07vs HillcrestLost 03
L#1 DoublesGail Howard / Cecilia Yost vs Dawn Williams / Sarah Ehrlich4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Gotchel / Maria Swenson vs Annette Vail / Barbara Fletcher1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Summa / Dixie Bender vs Soosyn Fuster-Marin / Cynthia Balchunas0-6, 2-6
2025-11-22vs Match MakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Pepe / Gail Howard vs Constance Moyer / Kathy Hulsizer4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Ammermann / Regina Gotchel vs Cristina Primrose / Mary Applinbuono2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnn Summa / Maria Swenson vs Debbie Anthony / Sonya Eddings4-6, 2-6
2025-11-16vs LV GalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristie Bower / Krista Marsh vs Patricia Brown / Sharon Miller4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Ammermann / Cecilia Yost vs Catherine Cummins / Janet JenningsOchs1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDixie Bender / Gail Urland vs Jacqueline Dolac / Kimberly Ganey2-6, 2-6
2025-11-09vs HillcrestLost 03
L#1 DoublesCecilia Yost / Catherine Pepe vs Rhonda Shaffer / Michele Christman6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Summa / Patricia Werder vs Sarah Ehrlich / Annette Vail6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDixie Bender / Mary Doherty vs Leslie Siebert / Cynthia Balchunas2-6, 1-6
2025-11-01vs LV GalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Pepe / Maria Swenson vs Anabela Araujo / Maryann Baloh1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Gotchel / Ann Summa vs Patricia Brown / Catherine Cummins0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Doherty / Dixie Bender vs Doreen Burgess / Jacqueline Dolac1-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs Match MakersWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristie Bower / Krista Marsh vs Kathy Benn / Cristina Primrose6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Werder / Laura Ammermann vs Kathy Hulsizer / Ingrid Unternahrer1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGail Howard / Catherine Pepe vs Debbie Anthony / Mary Applinbuono5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-18vs HillcrestSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKrista Marsh / Gail Urland vs Joan Crossan / Barbara Fletcher3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGail Howard / Catherine Pepe vs Cynthia Balchunas / Annette Vail4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gail Urland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Christie Bower
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.93
Catherine Pepe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.74
Gail Howard
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Krista Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Cecilia Yost
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.53
Patricia Werder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Ann Summa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
1.97
Dixie Bender
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laura Ammermann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Maria Swenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Doherty
published
Regina Gotchel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Bower + Krista Marsh5648% games−1.9% vs expected
Catherine Pepe + Gail Howard6254% gamesnot enough data
Maria Swenson + Mary Doherty5164% gamesnot enough data
Mary Doherty + Dixie Bender0534% gamesnot enough data
Laura Ammermann + Gail Urland303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Ammermann + Cecilia Yost123 matchesnot enough data
Maria Swenson + Regina Gotchel123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Pepe + Ann Summa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gail Urland
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Christie Bower
78W–147L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Catherine Pepe
39W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Gail Howard
19W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Krista Marsh
6W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Cecilia Yost
58W–64L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
Patricia Werder
15W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Ann Summa
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Dixie Bender
11W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Laura Ammermann
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Swenson
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Doherty
47W–49L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Regina Gotchel
2W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.